Recent Updates Toggle Comment Threads | Keyboard Shortcuts

  • xulfrepus 10:56 pm on September 30, 2014 Permalink | Reply  

    mccelt 

    The McCelt Particle

    body {background-color:#fff; background-image:url(“diagonal.png”);
    margin-left: 10px; margin-right: 10px; margin-top: 35px; }

    body,input ,td {font-family : Lucida Grande,verdana; font-size:13px; }

    a:link {color:#b04; text-decoration:underline ; border-color:#eee; }
    a:visited {color:#b04; text-decoration:underline ; border-color:#eee; }
    a:hover {color:#a03; text-decoration:none ; border-color:#ccc; ;}

    .nissinexxx {color: #c03;; background:#fff7f7;border:1px solid #fe8; width:460px; padding:4px;
    font-family : Lucida Grande,verdana; font-size:14px;
    }
    .nissinegood { color: #c36; background:#ffe; border:1px solid #fec; width:460px; padding:5px;
    font-family : Lucida Grande,verdana; font-size:14px;}

    .nissine11 { color: #fff; background:#c04; border:0px solid #fe8; width:460px; padding:5px;
    font-family : Lucida Grande,verdana; font-size:14px;}

    .nissine {margin:0; border:1px solid #fec; background:#ffe; background:#f9f9f9;
    padding:5px;; font-weight: bold; border:1px solid #fff;color:#c96;
    color:#c04;text-align:center; font-size:13px; width:460px;color:#999;
    box-shadow: 0 0 30px #eee;
    -moz-transition:box-shadow 3s, color 2s, border 2s, background-color 2s, -moz-transform 2s;
    -webkit-transition:box-shadow 3s, color 2s, border 2s, background-color 2s, -webkit-transform 2s;
    -o-transition:box-shadow 3s, color 2s, border 2s, background-color 2s, -o-transform 2s;
    transition:box-shadow 3s, color 2s, border 2s, background-color 2s, transform 2s;
    }
    .nissine:hover {margin:0; border:1px solid #fad; background:#f34; padding:5px;
    color:#fff;text-align:center; font-size:13px; width:460px;
    box-shadow: 0 0 30px #999; border:1px solid #bbb; background:#eee;color:#c04; }

    .nissinexxx:hover {margin:0; border:1px solid #fec; background:#ffe; padding:5px;
    color:#c04;text-align:center; font-size:14px; width:460px;
    -moz-transform:rotate(180deg);
    -webkit-transform:rotate(180deg);
    -o-transform:rotate(180deg);
    transform:rotate(180deg); }

    .dir {color:#999999;text-decoration: underline ; border-color:#eee; }

    .bubbleg { position:fixed;
    width:100%; top:0px; left:0px; vertical-align:bottom; border-bottom:1px solid #c6cad0;
    padding:3px; z-index:10000000; font-size: 11px; font-family : sans,verdana;

    background-color:#eeeef3;

    background: -moz-linear-gradient(90deg, #ece9d8 40%, #f4f3e9 80%); /* ff */
    background: -webkit-linear-gradient(90deg, #e6e6e6 30%, #f7f7f7 80%); /* goog safari*/
    background: -o-linear-gradient(90deg, #e6e6e6 30%, #f7f7f7 80%); /* op */
    background: -ms-linear-gradient(90deg, #e6e6e6 30%, #dfdfdf 80%);
    background: linear-gradient(0deg, #eeeee6 30%, #f7f7ee 80%);
    /* For Internet Explorer 5.5 – 7 */
    filter: progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorstr=#f7f7ff, endColorstr=#e6e6ee);
    /* For Internet Explorer 8 */
    -ms-filter: “progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient(startColorstr=#f7f7ff, endColorstr=#eeeef3)”;
    }

    .bubbleg a {color: #000;text-decoration:none; font-family : sans,verdana; }
    .bubbleg a:visited {color: #777; text-decoration:underline ;font-family : sans,verdana; }
    .bubbleg a:hover {color: #00f;text-decoration:underline ;font-family : sans,verdana; ;}

    .ten { font-size: 11px; }

    .whitebox {
    font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding:15px; width:70%; float:left;
    font-size: 12px;
    color: #000;
    background-color: #fff; }

    .explain {
    font-family: Verdana, Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif; padding:9px; margin:30px;
    font-size: 12px;
    color: #000;
    background-color: #fcfcfc; border:1px solid #ccc }

    .fixed {position:fixed; top:200px; right:00}

    .style1 {font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; color: #3366cc;}
    .style16 {font-size: 15px; font-weight: bold; color: #777;}
    .style4red {font-size: 16px; font-weight: bold; color: #fff;background-color:#c04;;padding:1 4px}
    .style4redsm {font-size: 12px; font-weight: bold; color: #a04;background-color:#fff;;padding:1 4px}

    .style4 {font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; color: #c00;background-color:#fff;;padding:1 4px}
    .style4sm {font-size: 14px; font-weight: bold; color: #c00;background-color:#fff;;padding:1 4px}
    .bored {font-size:16px; font-weight: bold;background-color:#f7f7f7;color:#c00;padding:3 6px; border:1px solid #ccc}

    .style44 {font-size: 20px; font-family: “Wingdings 2”, “Wingdings 3” }
    a.style2 {font-size: 20px; font-weight: bold; color: #47e;}
    a.style2:hover {font-size: 20px; font-weight: bold; color: #c04;}

    .style3 {font-size: 10px; color: #eee; }
    .style3 {font-size: 11px; color: #999; background-color:#fcfcfc; }

    strong { font-size: 13px; font-weight: bold;}
    .facebook {float:right}
    .facebook {float:left; }
    .fb_edge_widget_with_comment span.fb_edge_comment_widget iframe.fb_ltr { display: none !important;}

    .fb-like{ height: 26px; overflow: hidden;}

    .round {
    border-radius: 3px;
    -webkit-border-radius: 3px;
    -moz-border-radius: 3px;
    border-radius: 3px;
    }

    code {font-size:16px; font-family: monospace; }
    .code2 {font-size:20px; font-family: monospace; }
    .codeheight {font-size:16px; font-family: monospace; line-height:1}
    .codeheight9 {font-size:16px; font-family: monospace; line-height:.8}
    .codebig {font-size:24px; font-family: monospace; line-height:.8}
    .codesmall {font-size:14px; font-family: monospace; line-height:.9; letter-spacing:-1px }

    @media print {
    .bubbleg { background-color:#69d; position:relative; background-color:#ddddd3;
    width:100%; top:0px; left:0px; vertical-align:bottom;
    padding:9px; z-index:10000000; font-size: 11px; display:none; }
    .facebook,.none {display:none}
    .whitebox {font-family : Lucida Grande,verdana; font-size:12px;width:100%; }
    .pree {font-family : Lucida Grande,verdana; font-size:11px;}
    body { background-image:url(“”);}

    }

    function getum(){

    if(navigator.appName != “Microsoft Internet Explorer”){}//
    var www = window,
    ddd = document,
    eee = ddd.documentElement,
    ggg = ddd.getElementsByTagName(‘body’)[0],
    xxx = http://www.innerWidth || eee.clientWidth || ggg.clientWidth,
    yyy = http://www.innerHeight || eee.clientHeight || ggg.clientHeight;

    if (xxx > 850){document.getElementById(‘whitebox’).style.width = xxx – 280 + ‘px’;}
    if (xxx < 850){document.getElementById('whitebox').style.width = xxx – 70 + 'px';}
    //if (xxx 420){document.getElementById(‘spacer’).style.width = xxx – 420 + ‘px’;}
    document.getElementById(‘widthxxx’).innerText = xxx;
    document.getElementById(‘heightyyy’).innerText = yyy;
    }//

    //window.addEventListener(‘resize’, function(event){ getum(); });

    if(navigator.appName != “Microsoft Internet Explorer”){

    var addEvent = window.attachEvent||window.addEventListener;
    var event = window.attachEvent ? ‘onresize’ : ‘resize’;
    addEvent(event, function(){ getum(); });
    }//

    //line-height:.8

    function grey(gray){ // alert();

    var newSS, styles=’* { background: ‘+gray+’ ! important;border-color:#ccc !important ; color:#777 !important} :link, :link * {color: #36c !important } :visited, :visited * { color: #9966CC !important } .style1{background:’+gray+’! important;color: #c04 !important }’; if( document.createStyleSheet) {document.createStyleSheet(“javascript:'”+styles+”‘”); } else { newSS=document.createElement(‘link’); newSS.rel=’stylesheet’; newSS.href=’data:text/css,’+escape(styles); document.getElementsByTagName(“head”)[0].appendChild(newSS); }
    }//;

    function blackout(){

    var head = document.getElementsByTagName(‘head’)[0],
    style = document.createElement(‘style’),
    rules = document.createTextNode(‘* {background: #000 ! important; color:#090 !important;border-color:#009 !important } :link, :link * {color: #36c !important} :visited, :visited * { color: #9966cc !important} .style1{background: #111 ! important; color: #969 !important }’);

    //document.images.gpix.src = “gootarblack.png”;
    //document.images.gen6b.src = “gen6black.gif”;

    style.type = ‘text/css’;
    if(style.styleSheet)
    style.styleSheet.cssText = rules.nodeValue;
    else style.appendChild(rules);
    head.appendChild(style);

    }

    expireDate = new Date
    expireDate.setMonth(expireDate.getMonth()+6)
    jcount = eval(cookieVal(“jaafarCounter”))
    jcount++
    document.cookie = “jaafarCounter=”+jcount+”;expires=” + expireDate.toGMTString()

    function cookieVal(cookieName) {
    thisCookie = document.cookie.split(“; “)
    for (i=0; i<thisCookie.length; i++){
    if (cookieName == thisCookie[i].split("=")[0]){
    return thisCookie[i].split("=")[1]
    }
    }
    return 0
    }

    function page_counter(){ // alert(jcount)
    for (i=0;i<(7-jcount.toString().length);i++)
    document.write('0‘)
    for (y=0;y<(jcount.toString().length);y++)
    document.write('‘+jcount.toString().charAt(y)+’‘)
    }

    Notice: There are more explanations at http://www.gravityboy.com but when I wrote that I was still trying to make everything fit with mainstream.

    Then I realized… mainstream doesn’t have anything correct about this. The way to figure this out is to forget everything you know and start over.

    var dlll = document.location.toString();//alert(dlll)
    if (dlll.indexOf(‘http’) > -1){

    (function(d, s, id) {
    var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];
    if (d.getElementById(id)) return;
    js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id;
    js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”;
    fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs);
    }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

    }//

    <!–

    –>

    function ChangeFontSize(new_size)
    {
    document.getElementById(‘whitebox’).style.fontSize = new_size+’px’;
    //document.getElementsByClassName(‘style1′).style.fontSize = new_size+’px’;
    }

    Font Size
    A
    A
    A



    Translate

    Flux Particle Theory

    by James Clifford Cranwell

    http://www.mccelt.com/

     

    Everything in the Universe is made from one type of particle.

    All workings of the Universe are result from said particle.

    getum();

    Nothing is Solid. Space is not Empty. Everything is Connected

    Contrary to popular belief… nothing is even remotely solid.

    At the sub atomic level it is well known the nucleus radius to electron orbital ratio is one hundred thousandth.

    That makes the volumetric or spatial difference one quadrillionth = 10-15 = ( .000 000 000 000 001 ) .

    This ratio is approximately the same size as a spherical dot (tittle) above the  letter ” i ” (the proton) on the fifty – yard line in a football stadium (the orbital) everything else is empty space.

    That’s 99.9999999999999 % empty space.

    (4/3)Pi 13

    —————-

    (4/3)Pi 100,0003

    = 1

    ———————

    1,000,000,000,000,000
    = one 

    quadrillionth

    So, if we think of or visualize a huge sphere the size of a stadium (a small moon for instance), in reality the amount of actual continuous mass (just nuclei)
    is equivalent to a solid dot above the ” i ” made of only protons cut up into one quadrillion times 1,000 billion billion pieces and evenly dispersed.

    That’s how many (one quadrillion) “i” dots would fill the moon sized sphere (ignoring sphere packing) times the number of atomic radii (1,000 billion billion) it would take to fill every “i” dot.

    <!–

    quintillion *1 = 1e+18 ||| sextillion *1 == 1e+21

    (millimeter / angstrom) ^ 3 = 1000 * billion * billion == 1,000,000 * quadrillion == 1e+21
    That’s why neutrinos can zip right through anything completely unfettered and why the moon is only there when someone is looking at it… if we couldn’t see vibrations of electron energy, the moon would be completely unnoticed.

    It has the same amount of literally solid “stuff” as a spherical tittle.

    –>

     

    The Basic Fundamental Universal Substance.

    Although everything is mostly empty space, that still leaves something that must be there, something that can be considered solid (the one quadrillionth is the solid part.)

    What is it made from? Is it like clay? Is it like foam?

    There might not be a way to determine what the basic fundamental universal substance is actually made from (you will find out why later )… but we can determine what shape it must be by thinking geometrically.

    If we call the basic unit of whatever matter is comprised of a particle. The particle must be capable of conveying information, for instance electromagnetic vibrations.

    And since there are different frequencies and / or strengths of vibrations with multiple simultaneous combinations, a zero-dimensional Ø-D single (zero) point particle would be incapable of achieving this. It can spin or move or remain at rest but there is no chance of simultaneity or vibrations.

    The next possible alternative is the one dimensional 1-D line or string (any intrinsic universal characteristic should always be the simplest and at the same time most efficient option).

    The string seems to be the shape of choice in this case. On a musical instrument, a violin for instance, the string can convey a multitude of vibrations, tones and harmonics. This means there can be a lot of simultaneous information transmitted along a one dimensional string.

    The one dimensional strings like those explained in this theory not only work but they also give an easy explanation for anything and everything.

    There is no need to attempt theoretical construction of a particle shaped-like / made-from two dimensional 2-D planes because… you don’t keep looking for the answer after you have found it. And, a plane is a 2-D slice of a 3-D solid cube. Making it technically a 2-D solid. Nothing is Solid.

    Note: “Nothing is Solid” means there isn’t anythng that is actually solid.

    Everything is made from strings. (not the string theory type)

    The basic string is approximately one Ångström in length and can be considered 1-D, that’s one dimensional (although in reality it must actually have an infinitesimally small width)

    Ten of those strings form the basic particle… that’s 10 strings joined at their centers (or 20 radii emanating from a common center).

    This is the basic particle that is called a Flux Particle.

    Basic Flux Particle…

    This is the shape that makes everything work.
    If any strings join together at their ends and then more strings are attracted to the joint… it will build into the shape in question. When it reaches a point where there are twenty strings sticking into one center, that’s the point where no more strings will fit all the way into the center of the package, it’s the cut off point. The vertices of the dodecahedron or the faces of the icosahedron (platonic solids.)

    This is a way stuff can form and happen automatically.

    Space has a high tension particle field (in it)

    Space is not empty. It is comprised of a highly stretched (tensioned) particle field.

    It is made from the same basic particle as everything else (with nothing balled up, collapsed or twisted) and the particle field in space is also used for conveyance of light and gravity.

    This means the particle field in space is dodecahedral. Easily quantized… one particle per dodecahedral space pack (something like sphere packing)

     
    Important Note: If you removed the field and all particles from space… then space would actually be completely null and empty, an endless unbounded void. So, to set the record straight… Empty space would actually be empty but since space has an all-encompassing field in it, it is not empty.

    Everything is the same thing.

    What you call Gravity, Dark Matter and Dark Energy are all from the same thing.

    Dark energy — Everything is pulled on equally from all directions by the field
    Gravity — When 2 masses are introduced into the field the pull together
    Dark matter — The field itself is made from the same flux particle as everything else, it has mass but can’t be seen (it is what is used to convey light and pull objects together) — It is made from of course strings but not like string theory strings.

    An easy to understand two dimensional model of the Flux Particle Field would be something like a highly stretched tennis net made of the finest spiders web. And in this model "matter" would be a balled up piece of the web stuck to the net (everything is infinitesimally small).
    This field is not stationary in space with other things rushing through it like Michelson Morley mistakenly assumed. It is everywhere and surrounds matter. Yes, if the object is spherical like a planet or a star… of course the field will be curved around it.

    Of course the field is being dragged… Michelson Morley sent everyone down the wrong tracks.
    They didn’t create an experiment to detect the Ether… they created one to detect if the Earth is rushing through it.
    It is a field like any other field, connected to everything… in this case the Earth or Sun or whatever.

    If you do an experiment… make sure you test for every contingency.

     

    Isotopes and Nucleus Formations / Construction

    When the strings of a particle are balled up or collapsed… they are a proton or neutron.

    The individual radii (1 of 20 strings) are the connectors used to connect neutrons to protons (balled up) and protons to electrons (full length but twisted together).

    Everything is made out of the same particle and every particle has 20 strings unless it is smashed up deformed matter.

    A proton has one string balled (tightly wound together) with a neutron, 18 balled by themselves and one full length twist connected to an electron.

    A free proton would look like this   ~~~●~~~     (that’s one free string, 18 balled, one free string)

    A free neutron would look like this   ●~~~     (19 balled, and one free string)

    A free electron would look like this   ---∗---     (one free string, 18 free strings in a disc shape, one free string)

    A proton can grab a neutron and an electron.

    ●~~~ ~~~●~~~ ---∗---     (NPE on the loose)

    <!–
    ⋍≂≃≄≅≊ ●~~~~~●~~~---∗---

    –>

               ●●~~~∗---     (NPE combined)

    (that’s a neutron with its previously free string balled up together with one of the proton’s previously free strings (now also balled up) and the other proton string is twisted with an electron string (that free proton string and electron string twists are still full length))

    Two free protons   ~~~●~~~ ~~~●~~~  
    can combine and still be 2 protons   ~~~●●~~~   (that might look like 2 free neutrons but it is not because there are also balled up strings in the middle of the package holding them together.

    To clarify: two free neutrons
      ●~~~ ~~~●   that are now combined would look like this   ●●  

    If you throw another free proton into that 2 proton package   ~~~●●~~~ ~~~●~~~

    you will get one changing into a neutron when they combine   ~~~●●●~~~   that’s Helium-3

    If 4 free protons  
    ~~~●~~~ ~~~●~~~ ~~~●~~~ ~~~●~~~

    …grab each other 2 will change into neutrons   ~~~●●●●~~~

    And then the outer two that still have a free string can grab electrons…

    ---∗~~~●●●●~~~∗---   that’s regular Helium, it can also be called Helium-4

    If you understand the way this works… with a little thinking anyone can figure out isotopes.

    For instance why 3 protons would not make lithium-3

    i.e. why there can be extra neutrons but not just a bunch of protons (or extra protons)… we’ve just seen that above the way Helium-3 was created.

    Nucleus 3 can only be helium-3   ~~~●●●~~~   or Hydrogen-3 (tritium)   ●●●~~~  

    (Lithium-3 would be a nucleus with 3 protons and zero neutrons… and that can’t be a nucleus)

    “Lithium-4 contains three protons and one neutron. This is the shortest-lived known isotope of lithium. It decays by proton emission to helium-3 with half-life of about 10^−23 seconds.”

    ~~~●~~~ ~~~●~~~ ~~~●~~~ ~~~●~~~     (start with 4)

    ~~~●●●~~~ ~~~●~~~     (combine in only way possible to make 3 protons, 1 neutron… notice one proton is on the loose… not attached to nucleus, say goodbye, it’s unstable, eject it)

     

    Atom

    Something like an atom with Protons, Neutrons and Electrons has to be the correct model.

    Things are different weights, different colors, different properties, etc. but everything has to be made out of the same thing.

    An atom is the way to do it.

    They almost have the model correct… but everything is actually just strings and tension

     

    Electron    ---∗---

    An electron is shaped like the metal spines of an umbrella (without the hinges or fabric of course).
    One string extents from where your hand would hold it up to the center of axis. There, eighteen strings (or radii) extent out in the same curved disc type shape as the umbrella. The last string goes straight up (the same length as all the rest) and connects with the field in space (space is made of the same stuff by the way).

    Notice the way some elements in vertical columns in the Periodic table chart have an atomic number with difference of 18 between them. Most of the chart is like that (notice how many columns there are).

    It’s because 18 is the determinant number in electron shell configuration.

    Every electron particle has 20 strings.

    One string is attached to the proton.

    One string connects with space (or an electron in the next outer shell).

    The other 18 strings form the electron disc.

    When electrons connect with each other they have 18 strings to play with.

    Check the larger noble gases: Argon 18, Krypton 36, Xenon 54, Radon 86, the amount of electrons in outermost shells will always sum to 18, the first three even have atomic numbers that are multiples of eighteen. Three groups of six radii from one electron can form (along with seven other electrons) the corners of a cube or the "Octet Rule" and seal off the package.

    Important note: Electrons are actually particles but they (the strings they are made from) form a mesh-like cage around the nucleus. They are also held in place by string connections to the protons.

    An electron is actually not moving… only the vibrations that are traveling around the strings are moving… and that’s what everyone mistakenly thinks an electron is.

    Electrons (particles) cannot orbit around a nucleus.

    The protons are stationary and the (multiple) electrons that supposedly are orbiting would require a massive amount of bearings and axles. And they would also interfere with each others orbits.

    You can’t use “force” as the holder (or carrier) because any force is also made from particles or their connection.

    <!–

    That explanation is making a mess out of a mess.
    –>

    To make matters worse… an equatorial orbit (supposedly happening) would need something like a circular track around the proton (actually the nucleus as a whole) with a sliding connection. That’s ridiculous.

     

    Proton    ~~~●~~~

    The proton is 20 strings (like everything else) one string radii is attached to a neutron, one is attached to a electron and the other 18 remaining string radii are balled up or collapsed.

    If the strings collapse in groups of three each that would make 6 groups (3 * 6 = 18) or six types of (what they call) Quarks.

    And if they collapse in groups of six each that would make 3 groups (6 * 3 = 18) or three (what they call) Quarks in three flavors.

    Maybe the grouping during collapse happens in different numbers like… 3, 6 and 9 …that still sums to 18 strings.

    The jury is still out on all of this Quark business. When they smash up protons they assume they have found different subatomic particles because of the different weights. That is just a different number of strings being smashed apart.

    If you magnified a proton until it was the size of the dot above the letter “i” then the strings could be compared to something a lot finer than the web of a spider extending out a few hundred meters. Fine enough where eighteen strings can curl into a space the size of the proton and have a spaghetti ball type configuration with a very loose string (or filament) pack.

    It is the way to make the most universe with the least amount of material. And only one type of material.

    Neutron    ●~~~

    A neutron is the same as proton but with 19 string radii balled up or collapsed. And when it is in the nucleus all 20 are collapsed (although one of the 20 is collapsed in unison with a proton string)

    One Proton string and one Neutron string balled up or collapsed together is called a Meson.

    Neutrino   

    A Neutrino is a completely balled up or collapsed particle (all 20 strings) or a group of completely balled up particles ●● NOT connected to the field or anything else.

    The speed of light is completely irrelevant to a Neutrino. The speed of light is field stuff, the neutrino is on its own.

    You could say the Neutrino is in the “ultimate time” zone.

     

    Everything Particle…

    Remember… regardless of the theory, everything is made out of particles.

    That includes all forces and all fields.

    A field is a group of particles.

    A force is a particle(s) action on other particles (i.e. particles pulling other particles).

    If anyone explains for example the four forces… what they are really saying is there are four different particles and / or groups of those particles. (actually it’s the same particle doing four different things)

    Electromagnetic field? — That would be a group of particles.

    Gravitational field? — That would be a group of particles.

    Gravitational force? — That would be a group of particles pulling.

    The strong nuclear force? — That is supposedly a gluon — a particle.

    Example: A supposed graviton, that is the supposed force carrier for gravity? So any force is comprised (made) of particles.

    Everything (except energy) is either a particle or a group of particles.

    (energy is vibrations traveling in particles (a photon is also only a particle vibration))

    If you find forces or fields mentioned anywhere… just (mentally) replace the words “force” (or field) with “particle(s).” Then it’s easy to see if the explanation is ridiculous because most times it becomes nonsense, can only work by magic or is just plain wrong.

    Particles in explanations can also become doubled up… they might say a field (actually a group of particles) has a “mediator particle” or a “force carrier” (a particle). That is a great example of not knowing how something works so they add more stuff (actually the same stuff with a different name) in to try and explain it.

    If you ever hear something like… “A field has a force carrier” …do not walk away, run!

     

    The Intrepid Photon?

    What they refer to as a photon is actually just a vibration traveling along the strings. (not the string theory type)

    ~~~~~~~∿~~~~~~~

    That is why Wave Particle Duality is a mess…

    Light is not a particle. That would mean there is some type of matter involved.

    If light were a particle it would be some type of matter.

    Does anyone really think there is a “matter stream” leaving your flashlight at the speed of light when you turn it on?. Think about how much matter would be bombarding us from the Sun… where is it all going?

    Visible Light is only a small section of the electromagnetic spectrum…

    There is a huge amount of other frequencies.

    And if they are all “matter streams” it would mean that space is filled with vibrating matter (particles) coming and going (zipping around at the speed of light) in every possible direction, frequency and intensity.

    Think about how many particle collisions there would be.

    A photon is a particle…? Nope… that’s ridiculous, and even though it’s wrong it still results in space being filled with particles (which is actually correct… they are just not zipping around).

    <!–

    Atomic radius decrease across period
    –>
     

    Gluon

    All forces are made from particles

    Here are two particles… ● ●

    A gluon is holding them together?

    ●§●

    Ok… but there must be two mechanisms,

    ●~~§~~●

    one mechanism would be holding first particle to gluon and the other mechanism would be holding the gluon to the other particle.

    So the particles must also have the mechanism built in…

    ●~   ~§~   ~●

    and therefore they do not need the gluon…

    ●~~●

    Whatever the mechanism is… that is what they mistakenly think a gluon is.

    Get it? Every particle has / is something that can connect to other particles.

    And all forces are made from particles.

    That eliminates most of mainstream physics.

     

    Vacuum of Space?

    Space is not a vacuum, it is normal, we are under pressure.

    also… I’m sure the vacuum energy of (actually non) empty space is not a vacuum, it is tension on the field of strings. I would bet my life on it.

    It also explains (what they call) Dark Energy… everything is being pulled on (not pushed) equally from every direction.

    If there are two end points (any type of matter, planets or anything) that creates a stronger connection and they pull together — that’s gravity.

     

    The Four Forces using strings and tension…

    Strong Force — When two strings are completely balled up in the proton-neutron pack.
    A neutron has 19 strings balled up and one connecting to a proton (also balled up, they are calling those two balled up strings a gluon).   ●●  

    Electro-magnetic force — If there is one full length proton-electron connection twisted together like a corkscrew that is another strength force. (different ╲|╲|╲|╲|╲ direction ╱|╱|╱|╱|╱ corkscrew… different type… matter , anti-matter. )
          

    Electrons in their shell also connect to each other but the amount of string that is twisted together is different relative to the distance out in the shell. Further out… bigger sphere, less string twist connection, less stable.
    An easy to visualize model is folded hands tightly together would be small size atoms. But as you pull your hands apart there would be less and less of your fingers touching until only the finger tips touched… that’s large size, outer and unstable.

      ---∗~~~∗~~~∗---  

      ---∗--~--∗--~--∗---  

      ---∗--- ---∗--- ---∗---  

    <!–

    ╱╱╱╱╱╱ ╲╲╲╲╲╲ ã
    ∼∼∼∗∼∼∼ ∽∽∽∗∽∽∽ ∗ *

      ---∗-~~-∗-~~-∗---  

      ~~~~~~~∿~~~~~~~  ~~~~~~~∿~~~~~~~

      ←←←∗⇄⇄⇄∗⇄⇄⇄∗→→→  

      ←←←∗→⇄⇄←∗→⇄⇄←∗→→→  

      ←←←∗→→⇄←←∗→→⇄←←∗→→→  

      ←←←∗→→→←←←∗→→→←←←∗→→→  

      ←←←∗→→→ ←←←∗→→→ ←←←∗→→→  
    ←→⇄∼∽◢◣◤◥◢◤◢◤◢◤◢◤◣◥◣◥◣◥◣◥╱╱╱╱╱╲╲╲╲╲►►►∗╳▷▶◀◁◆◇╱╲
    –>

    Weak force — radioactive decay and instability in certain nuclei… the reason for instability in heavy (larger size) elements is the connecting strings are a certain length and the bigger the atom gets the less the string connections become…

    Big atoms with weird configurations, something odd with the assembly and other problems.

    Gravitational force — The particle radii are arranged in the dodecahedral axis shape, packed together in space something like sphere packing and only near the endpoints of strings are touching. Hardly any string twisted together, very weak force (maybe only endpoint touching) that is the gravitational field (made of particles (of course))

    Cosmological Constant: Fifth Force : Dark Energy : Quintessence

    are what others have been unknowingly calling the the stretching property (tension) of Flux Particle Field.

    Dark Matter: Luminiferous Æther : The Aether etc.

    That’s what the field itself (and any loose particles) which completely fill space are unwittingly called. (you cannot see something that conveys light)

    Higgs, The God particle. etc.

    Are what one individual particle has been inadvertently called (actually only one aspect of the particle).

     

    Fine-Tuned Laws of Nature?

    If you changed the value of for instance the Cosmological Constant (that’s the field tension) would that make our existence impossible? No, everything else (including gravitational strength and the speed of light, etc.) would change right along with it… completely proportionally. If the Universal field tension did change we might not even notice it and we would measure it (actually what we mistakenly think *it* is) as the same it has always been. Explained further here… time

     

    Gravitational field intensity…

    Gravity is when 2 or more objects are connected by field strings and the added tension pulls them together.
    Gravitational strength is the number or amount of field connections…

    one connection per atomic width (regular matter),
    one connection per neutron / proton width (neutron / proton star),
    one connection per string width, that’s just connections (that would be what they say a black hole is).

    Atoms are mostly empty space (99.9999999999999 % empty space)
    Protons and neutrons are solid?

    From NASA…

    http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/science/know_l1/pulsars.html

    A neutron star is about 20 km in diameter and has the mass of about 1.4 times that of our Sun.
    This means that a neutron star is so dense that on Earth, one teaspoonful would weigh a billion tons!
    Because of its small size and high density, a neutron star possesses a surface gravitational field about 2 x 10^11 times that of Earth.

    2 x (10^11) = 200,000,000,000

    <!–

    Neutron star
    I wanted to find out how big the Sun would be just in neutrons / protons, so…
    I divided the radius by 100,000 (that’s nucleus to atomic width ratio)
    radius of the sun / one hundred thousand = 6.95500 kilometers

    note: exact radius would be…

    (4 / 3) * 3.1416 * (10^3) = 4,188.8 = (volume of neutron star with radius 10)

    cube root(((4,188.8 / 1.4) / 3.1416) / (4 / 3)) = 8.93903535 kilometers = (radius of neutron star with 1.4 times less mass)

    ==========================
    –>

    The field connections (strings) from any object are only connecting to the gravitational field via the protruding surface strings of the object. So, to find how many neutrons would fit in the same size circular surface area as an atomic width (that would be the number of actual field connections) just use a simple circular area.

    This should give the increase in surface gravitational field connections…

    (3.1416 * 100 000^2) / (3.1416 * 1^2) = 10,000,000,000

    hmmm… amazing number. It is 1 / 20 the number given by Nasa.

    That means to make my number fit exactly I need to multiply it by 20.

    Anyone know what that might be? Why 20 connections more?

    What the hell could be made of 20 somethings?

    p.s. A Black Hole gravitational field works the same way, it just has a lot more connections, also very easy to figure out.

    Also… A neutron star cannot be made entirely of neutrons…

    ●●●●●●●●●●●●

    The outer edge (surface) would have to be either protons with a very tightly packed (and weird) electron configuration (that explains the extra 20) — OR — just protons, possibly even a number of levels deep (this also might be 20) with the lower level free strings sticking up through the spaces between the outer level. I’m not absolutely sure… I’ve never been there, done that.

    V V V V V V V V V V V V

    |V|V|V|V|V|V|V|V|V|V|V|

    |||||||||||||||||||||||

    ●|●|●|●|●|●|●|●|●|●|●|●

     ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ● ●

    The electrons normally form an atom sized spherical mesh type cage around a tiny nucleus with only a dozen or so free proton strings going off in every direction. The electrons would be evenly spaced around the sphere.

    With a neutron star it is a completely different story… a small section of the surface area could be considered flat and the billions and billions of extra connections are almost straight-up parallel.

     

    Black Hole – Void Sphere – Null Space

    There is No need for a Black Hole.

    NOTE: I am not saying there are no Black Holes, this is just an example of how observational evidence is worthless and might be completely wrong.

    This video show stars orbiting around something non visible, what appears to be nothing, so it must be a black hole?

    Stars Orbiting Milky Way Super Massive Black Hole

    You know what else they could be orbiting?

    Nothing!

    Any two objects like planets are connected by a string field with tension.

    (or if you are still living in the past you can say there is a curve or warp)

    There must be some kind of connection from one to the other (warp or space is curved)

    So if you add more objects and they are swirling around a common center. That means there would be a tension stretch coming from every direction concentrated right in the center of the swirl.

    So if there is a star near the common center with the massive concentrated omni-directional tension (call it warp or curve if you like) which way do you think the pull would be? Toward the massive amount of tension or away from it?

    There are supposedly 100 billion stars in the galaxy. So that means there are 100 billion things pulling on a common center. There actually doesn’t have to be anything there. Galaxies might have what is referred to as a black hole but they can also hold themselves together.


    The galactic tension pull is actually planar not omni-directional so it is even more concentrated then what you were just thinking.

    And if there were enough tension on the common center to create a tear in the “fabric of space” it would create a void or a null-space-sphere (actually an oblate spheroid). The edges of the void sphere would have the build-up of the torn / ripped particle field – just like a rip in a fishnet stocking – that is now enclosing literally nothing. That instantly disperses the tension from a single point to the surface of a hollow sphere. So if space ever does actually rip… it has a way to seal itself right back off (stop the tear) and eliminate the chance of it happening again in that spot.

    Can light travel through it on the inside? No! Light is only a vibration traveling through the particle field. Inside the void sphere there are no particles.

    Can you travel into the void sphere? Yes, but inside there is no light or heat transmission, no gravity and no particle field — and that is what is transmitting all the vibrations (energies) so, you can’t lose any heat, it has no where to go, it can’t vibrate away anymore.

    Will you collapse because of the loss of field tension? Maybe, maybe not… if you have a highly stretched tennis net and cut a piece out of it… the piece is not going to collapse into nothingness.

    Any light hitting it (from 100 billions stars etc.) would be forced / coerced into traveling around what can be called the event horizon of the sphere — just like an electrons string-mesh-type-cage (that’s the only place it can travel) there of course would be a build up and the only place to release is at the poles as jets (no extreme tension there).

    To sum it up: “Nothing” has all the proprerties they say a Black Hole does. And sometimes “nothing” can be a real cool hand!

     

    No Magic Allowed…

    Everything has to be directly (physically) connected.

    1) Energy cannot be out on its own… there is no such this as “pure energy.”

    Energy is a vibration on a particle or movement of particles.

    Think of a guitar string. If you pluck it… it will move and vibrate and that is the energy…

    Could you convert the vibrations or movement into mass?

    No, and if you take away the string you won’t even have a way to make vibrations or movement.

    Is there pure energy? Just energy? …Nope.

    2) A force has to be (made out of) something. i.e. a particle.

    You can push or pull particles with other particles… you cannot push or pull particles with nothing.

    3) Particles have to be directly (physically) connected to other particles or they won’t be able do anything (except magic).

    Think about a magnet and iron filings… the magnet can move and actually hold the filings in place.

    That could not happen unless there was a continuous connection of particles.

    MAGNET~~~~~~~~~~~~IRON

    Look what happens if there is a break in the field (the particles)…

    MAGNET~~~~~~   ~~~~~~IRON

    Would that still work?

    A magnetic field is a field.

    A field is made out of particles.

    If there is a break in the particle field that means there is absolutely nothing where the break is.

    Nothing is Nothing. (Something nonexistent is not something, it is nonexistent)

    4) Everything has to happen (or form) automatically but it cannot be by magic.

    The Universe did not come with an instruction manual. Anything that happens, forms, changes, etc. has to happen all on its own.

     

    5) What Einstein calls “Space-Time” has to be made out of something. And something has to be particles (it can’t be nothing.)

    Anything (field, foam?) that fills space will also have to convey light (and a host of other things).

    If something fills space and you can see it… that would mean you would not see anything, it would be like being immersed in a pool of dark muddy water. When you open your eyes you can’t see anything… the muddy water is right up against your eyes.

    p.s. foam will not work.

    6) Think about it… stuff at the most basic level (proton, electron, quark, etc.) cannot be spheres, sphere-like or zero-point Ø-D.

    Spheres can only spin, remain at rest, or travel in a straight line… no vibrations, and vibrations are everything.
    And how is a sphere going to be held in place?

    If anything is not actually held together it will just fly apart.

    Anything “spinning” is completely out of the question… it would require axles and universal joints.

    Nothing could be held together by particles exchanging or “shooting” other particles at each other… that’s ridiculous non-sense.

    7) A basic force cannot be a large scale group process, like friction or glue.

    Glue for instance is a large molecule. When you think in terms of the very small you can’t use things like that.

    It could not be the most basic particle construct.

    Basic things have to operate automatically with a very basic process.

    You cannot explain the basic working of something and use something that only works as a large scale group of things.

    Do you catch my drift? If things were held together by glue (at a quantum level) you are not at the smallest level and you would also have to explain how quantum glue works…. and you can’t have glue or stickiness at that basic level (very small size). And above all else… a basic force would be the action of (most likely) just one particle.

     

    Electric and Magnetic field

    Both of those (particle) fields are only an effect that originates from the same thing… the actual particle field the encompasses space made of strings.

    The electric and magnetic particle field (they originate from the same thing) are just vibrations or a shape change in the real (flux) particle field.

    An easy 2-D example is the highly stretched tennis net made of the finest spiders web.

    _____________________

    |||||||||||||||||||||

    |||||||||||||||||||||

    |||||||||||||||||||||

    |||||||||||||||||||||

    If you were on one side of the net and plucked a string, the vibration would travel along string to the other side of the net. That vibration would set off perpendicular vibrations (and in the real field a shape change if strong enough) up and down in it’s travels.

    If you ask… “wouldn’t the whole net just vibrate?”
    …Yes, of course it would but using another example of an actual spiders web…

    If the spider is sitting directly in the middle of his web and something (a bug) lands in his web… he knows the exact direction and placement of the bug.

    This is because the spider and the bug have now actually set up endpoints for a more powerful string vibration… there is a mass on both ends of the web string. And of course whatever string had the initial pluck would have the most powerful vibration.

    Remember this is a linear one string example, in a real field the vibration would expand away spherically. But there is of course always endpoints, every atom with protons / neutrons is an endpoint.

    The field also has lattice type properties so it can fold-up or curve around objects.

    If it folds in one particular direction that means there would be a lot of string connections in parallel with the fold (that would make it a lot stronger in whatever direction that might be.)

        ____________________

       /////////////////////

      /////////////////////

     /////////////////////

    /////////////////////

    Think about how easy it is to fold up a tennis net. Even if there was a person on every one of the 4 corners tensioning the net… an increased diagonal pull from opposite corners would easily change the direction of all strings in the net, actually almost lining them up.

    “Spooky action at a distance…?” that’s when two endpoints set up their own string connection.

     

    Dimensions.

    There are no higher dimensions, no alternate universes, no parallel worlds.

    Anything like that would be noticed as a disruption in the (particle) field.

    A large enough cohesive group of anything would interact with the particle field and get noticed.

    The only out-of-the-ordinary type thing happening is individual neutrinos passing through everything.

    No lower dimensions either…

    Even the one dimensional string used in this theory (or string theory)… it doesn’t matter how small it is… it (of course) has a length but it would also have to have and infinitesimally small thickness, that would give it a height and width, or three dimensions.

    Theoretically a string is 1-D, but it is actually 3-D.

    Everything is actually 3-D (the strings) but theoretically (mathematically only)… nothing is 3-D.

    A proton is Ø-D (zero-D). Most of the strings (19 out of 20 if in a nucleus) are balled-up / collapsed into (what can be called) a point.

    A string is 1-D theoretically or mathematically.

    The electrons are (for the most part) 2-D (two dimensional).

    18 of the electron (1-D) strings form a 2-D disc (umbrella like, curved plane) pattern.

    When a group of electrons join together they form a spherical string-mesh-type-cage around the nucleus… and that is how they can mimic a 3-D solid (maybe you can actually call that “theoretically 3-D?” A spiders web would be a 2 dimensional object but if you wrapped it around a basketball, the spiders web would be spherical… mimicking 3-D ).

    We’re seeing this whole configuration through a 10-D particle field.

    The 10 axis of the individual particles are arranged in 10 different directions forming the field and that can be considered a 10 dimensional particle field.

    So if you want to bump up one dimension higher than the dimension you actually see things in, you’re going to have to contemplate a mysterious visitor from the eleventh dimension (not the fourth).

     

    Spatial dimension is directions.

    An Abbott Flatlander from Flatland living on a two dimensional plane (like a piece of paper) would actually be living on an infinity of dimensions if he can turn or move through every angle or vector direction on the supposed plane. And… of course, nothing is solid.

    If you had a literally solid 3-D cube (which cannot / does-not exist)… a piece-of-paper-like plane would be one slice of it. That means a paper plane is a 2-D solid. Nothing is solid. Paper-like planes do not exist.

    The way this actually works is by using axial directions as dimension.

    An actual working two dimensional model of space would be an infinite array of 2-D (XY) axis shaped particles arranged in a plane.

    ++++++++++++++

    ++++++++++++++

    ++++++++++++++

    ++++++++++++++

    ++++++++++++++

    In this 2-D model light is coerced into traveling in straight lines in only two directions (This model can also warp or flex, forcing the curvature of light).
    If you took enough 2-D particles and curved and connected them into a spherical surface shape, it would be misinterpreted as 3-D.

    The actual 2-D electrons are pulling this same prank by arranging themselves spherically and mimicking a 3-D solid. Nothing is actually 3-D and / or solid.

    A 3-D model would also include the toward and away (XYZ) axis. But in the real world particle vibrations (light transmissions) occur in every possible direction, a 2-D and / or 3-D particle will not sufficiently transmit vibrations along a diagonal. So, a 3-D particle cannot be the correct model for space.

    The particle capable of angular conveyance must be of higher dimension (axial directions) and have the most efficient shape to pack space. It turns out to be a particle with 10-dimensions or ten axes.

    This axial concept allows for an actual visual of higher dimensions.

    You have to remember… nothing is 3-D and / or solid.

     

    The Dodecahedron

    <!–

    dodecahedron
    –>

    The Dodecahedron (DDH) is the pattern or axial arrangement used by the particle (10 axis, 20 radii). It is stackable hyperbolically and absolutely the most efficient way to pack space with the least amount of material (smallest angle of symmetrical invariance). Any more than ten axes per particle and they won’t connect.

    The only problem is the vertices are tri-linear (where any axis terminates it will intersect with three others).
    If a frequency traveling along an axis passes directly through the center, then out any of the tri-corners, that same linear direction will not pass through any other of the twelve Dodecahedrons in proximity.

    It will be directly on the edge where any four Dodecahedrons meet. So the individual Photon which we now know is one vibration traveling along the Unit Flux strings can never take a straight path. The vertices where the Dodecahedrons meet have four paths.

    If you place three base balls on the ground in a triangle then place another on top to make a pyramid shape, that will be the way the base balls and Dodecahedrons stack. The only problem here is where the base balls touch each other is not where the Unit Flux Strings are located. The end points the Flux Strings terminate on tri-corners. Thus sending the intrepid photon on a Zigzag, Corkscrew, and other intricate paths destined to scatter.

    It is easy to angle out of position with nothing else around. It is the combined effect of many photons initially heading in one direction with momentum that keep each other in line and in proper direction except of course near the scattering outer fringes. This is the reason why one photon particle traveling in a zigzag can also be interpreted as wave function. Its path is forced into a wave type motion. A vibration sets off resonant vibrations in itself, perpendicular to the original path. Thus creating other fields and background radiation.

     

    Waves…

    Space is a string particle field.

    The vibrations (energy) move in waves. When light is emitted from a source it will actually be a group of vibrations (what they call photons).

    You can have the individual particles vibrating in some type of unison creating a traveling wave or a massive shock to the whole field. If you have a beach towel made of vibrating particles you can also give it the sine wave shake to get the sand off.

    Here’s a question: The speed of light would be the speed the particle vibrations travel through the towel… what is the speed of the shock wave / sine wave? (a shock wave would be caused by something like a supernova)

    NOTE: You can also have a compression type wave.

     

    Everything is inert…

    The energy contained in the nucleus of an atom is actually only potential energy

    Mass… for instance something that has a proton, that’s a particle with most of its strings balled up, sitting there completely inert with the field strings (by way of the electron strings) pulling tension on it / them from multiple directions. It doesn’t actually convert into energy… it releases what can be considered its energy by un-balling. The particle is still there but now its shape has changed into the regular particle (un-balled) 10 strings with common center (or 20 radii).

    When something like a reaction happens and the balled up proton strings can unwind… the field strings will pull (actually snap) all of the proton strings to their full length (that’s the same length as the field strings) going from the size of a proton to commandeering the volumetric size an atom takes up in space.
    Every proton unballing would add a new field particle (or unit of space) thereby displacing the field particles that were already there.

    This instantly creates the massive disruption (instant extra field particle strings) in the particle field in one spot and the electro-magnetic pulse.

    Note: this is not the same as accelerating protons in the LHC. There, the protons actually do have energy because they are moving and smashing together.

     

    Mechanical reason for speed of light "c" in E = mc^2

    Here is the one inch equation everyone talks about…
    TL = mc^2     (notice both sides are equal to “E”)

    TL = mc^2

    |--inch--|

    It incorporates string tension and length, mass and the speed of light.

    Equation itself explains their correlation and gives understanding of the way things work.

    Ether is what they called they conveyance of light or what is filling space.

    The strings are actually how light is propagating.

    A photon is not a particle. It is only a vibration travelling along / through the string field.

    The speed of light is of course the speed vibrations travel along the strings.

    So the strings are what Newton and everyone else thought the ether was.

    Einstein was smart… he knew how to keep everyone happy, and called it Space-Time.

    The math was easy, actually serendipity…

    The equation… TL = mc^2 …looks like I was trying to copy Einstein or something because Tension times length also equals Energy TL = E… but that is not the case.

    I was actually trying to find the tension of space (actually the tension of the string particle field that is in space)…

    We know there is a field of strings encompassing space and the reason for energy is just vibrations caused by tension on the strings.

    Protons, neutrons, etc. everything is inert.

    Everyone knows the speed of light. That would be the speed the vibrations travel along the strings.
    So I found the formula for tension…

    Tension = velocity squared x mass / length.


    I needed to find a mass and a string length. The length of the string is easy, it would be the somewhere around the atomic width or one angstrom. But finding even an approximate mass… that is a different story.

    The strings in question here are the basic universal substance. When you see something you are really only seeing the strings vibrate. What is considered “mass” on the other hand is the strings pulling objects together. I’m not sure if there actually is a way to determine the mass of something that is used as the mechanism of mass itself?

    Example: any two objects connected by a string. The tension and the length can remain the same no matter what the mass of the string actually is. On a vh guitar the six strings are all the same length and basically the same tension but vary greatly in mass.

    So I used the closest known available approximation I could think of…

    electron mass = 9.10938188 × 10^-31 kilograms… actually 1/10 electron mass. (any particle including the electron has 10 strings joined at their centers, one string should be 1/10 of that and should be the mass of one string?).

    So, I plugged everything in…

    Tension = c^2 x (1/10 electron mass) / angstrom

    So the formula is now… T = c^2 * m / L

    Then I multiplied both sides by "L"

    Formula is now… TL = mc^2

    Both sides of the equation are in joules or energy… equivalent to "E".

    I was completely amazed.
    It means the Tension of the strings in space times their length is equal to their energy.

    And I arrived at that completely independently.

    This is why the speed of light is involved in Einsteins mass energy equivalence equation…

    E = mc^2 …I always wondered why… now I know.

    It had to be something mechanical… tension and string lengths!

    So, you can arrive at Einsteins famous formula from completely different directions.
    You can think energy is contained in mass and released.

    E = mc^2


    Or you can think there is a field of strings and mass is inert, the energy is only potential…

    released (actually pulled) by tension on the strings

    TL = mc^2

    Tension of Space

    ((the speed of light^2) * .1 * electron mass) / (1 angstrom) = 8.18710414 × 10^-5 newtons

     

    Exact proton to atomic width size change:

    The width of an atom is 100,000 times larger than the nucleus.


    That makes the volumetric (spherical) difference of helium one quadrillion… 1,000,000,000,000,000

    That means one quadrillion nucleus sized spheres can fit inside an atom sized sphere.


    So if a proton converts from balled up to atom size, that is the exact change in size of the field at the spot. The amount of disruption or change in field size (commandeering) is from nucleus size to atom size.


    This is the equivalent of energy (vibrations into the field) released by the shape change.


    It would be like having one particle then having one quadrillion particles.

    The check… E = mc^2 …mass times speed of light squared is the amount of Energy.

    And the Energy is equal to Tension times string Length… TL = mc^2


    And since everything is strings, and there are 20 string per particle, and there were 4 protons / neutrons in the nucleus (of this model).


    Here is the answer (in meters per second)…

    speed of light squared / one quadrillion = 89.8755179

    And there are 20 strings per particle…


    89.8755179 / 20 = 4.49377589

    And there where 4 particles (proton, neutron) in the nucleus…


    4.49377589 / 4 = 1.12344397

    Since the answer is almost exactly one… it means if you divided the speed of light (squared) up into one quadrillion proton sized particles with 20 strings each they would almost exactly fit inside an atom sized sphere.

    You have to understand what I mean by commandeering to understand this.


    p.s. if you take sphere packing into account the answer might be even closer to one.


    You have to remember the 100,000 (thousand) sized difference (although very accurate) is only an estimate.

    Mass doesn’t actually convert into energy… it changes shape.

    Mass (a proton) changes in shape and that shape change vibrates the field… that is energy. The proton was made of balled-up strings and they are still there but straightened.


    It is kind of like if you had a guitar string with tension on it and added a millimeter instantly to the length… it would make the string vibrate.


    They call it potential energy.

     

    Extrapolate it yourself…

    1) There is definitely something filling space and there are lot of different models and names for it.

    2) Einstein called it Space-Time, others call it the Higgs field, others call it something else.

    3) It has to be made out of something and strings are a good choice.
    Individual string particles (not the string theory type) that join together forming a field. (zero-dimensional Ø-D point particles won’t work, next option 1-D strings)

    4) Particles in the field also pop-in and pop-out of existence… that means the field has to be made of the same thing that forms regular matter.

    5) Everything also has to have a direct physical connection (or the only way things would work is by magic (and magic is not allowed)). So the particles also have to be able to disconnect and reconnect by themselves.

    6) Everything would also have to work and form automatically (particles do not come with an instruction manual they can look at).

    Here is an example of spontaneous self-assembly formation…

    Something like that must also be happening at the quantum (most basic fundamental) level.

    7) If you add in things that you know are happening (like light or energy being transmitted at specific frequencies and definite speed) you can eliminate a lot of theories that cannot be correct…. like foam and most others.

     

    Automatic Arrangement

    Everyone has seen a balloon cluster (for instance) in a car dealership?

    There will always be 12 balloons if they pull the knotted ends into a common center.

    That is exactly how many fit. It is the same as the faces of the dodecahedron.

    Notice where the balloons always touch in groups of three? There are twenty spots like that. If you stuck drinking straws or pencils into all twenty spots all the way into the center… that is how the arrangement of strings form.

    Flux Particle fits perfectly inside dodecahedron .

    Note: No one is shooting for that shape when they tie balloons together.

    Everyone comes up with the same shape because 12 is how many fit together like that.

    It’s an automatic shape.

    Automatic shapes happen. It is the way everything happened.

     

    The Goldilocks Corkscrew

    Check out this shape… corkscrew ball

    This is only an example but if there were a lot of these things floating around and they got near enough to touch they would automatically connect… actually form a field on their own.

    If you had a whole bag full of them you would not need the bag anymore… they would stay together on their own.
    They can only form a field by connecting then pulling, no pushing allowed, it would just become floppy, no Dark Energy (in the way ‘they’ think it works anyway).

    If there were no corkscrew and the strings were straight nothing would connect. So there must an ultimate / optimum amount of (the Goldilocks) twist to readily allow connection and disconnection

    NOTE: this is only an example of automatic connection and it is easy to see it could be happening at a quantum level. There is no glue at quantum level. Connections can only be basic and automatic.

    If anyone can come up with any other mechanism of automatic connection I would really like to hear it.

     

    Stationary Ether?

    They used to think light needed a medium to propagate. That is actually correct. The only mistake they made was thinking the medium was fixed in space and the Earth must be rushing through it (that is what they call an erroneous constraint).

    The medium is actually the string particle field.

    The field from the Sun encompasses the solar system (plus more) and the field moves with the Sun.

    The Sun (and solar system field) are also moving at high orbital speed around the galactic centre.

    If you had to pick a fixed position for a supposed stationary field (or medium), that would be a better choice… but not the best because the Milky Way Galaxy is also moving through the Universe.

    Claiming a fixed field would be relative solely to the Earth’s orbit is not only wrong in more ways than one… it is complete baboonery.

    The Earth has of course the same field but smaller and it is inside the Suns field.

    The Earths field is moving with the Earth. You have a field surrounding you.

    MM tested for a Stationary Ether… They thought the Earth was rushing through it at an enormous speed… how could that work if you are inside a closed building or underground in a cave?


    »»»»»»»»/»\»»»»»»»»»»»

    »»»»»»»/»»»\»»»»»»»»»»

    »»»»»»/»»»»»\»»»»»»»»»

    »»»»»/|—–|\»»»»»»»»

    »»»»»»|»»||»|»»»»»»»»»

    »»»»»»|»»||»|»»»»»»»»»
    Does the Ether rush through the walls of your house

    or do sections get cut off and stay in place?

    It does not matter… neither of those work.

    Do little sections of the stationary field (that the Earth is supposedly rushing through) get cut off and remain in place behind closed doors? That would mean the field is being dragged. So it is not stationary.

    Anybody understand this?

    The only way for a stationary Ether to work is if it could penetrate all matter. But then that would mean the light that is using this stationary field would also penetrate everything. Get it? If that were the case you would not be able to see matter because light would go right through it.

    1) If light could pass through things completely unfettered… everything would be completely invisible.

    2) If light can pass right through something but you could still tell that something was there it would look like glass or clear ice.

    GP-B just tested for Space-Time… Yes… It is there. What is space-time? it is this same particle field of strings explained in this theory.

    Is the field it creates curved? Yes, but only because the mass it surrounds is spherical. You can think of it like an atmosphere. Any light passing through a curved field will of course obviously curve (gravitational lensing) or deflect.

    The field is responsible for the conveyance of light, electromagnetism, gravity, dark energy, mass and everything else.

    Everything is made from the same thing, the string particles.

    The particles and the fields they create are all there is, it is everything.

     

    Big Bang   RED SHIFT  

    The only reason for the Big Bang Theory is the red-shift of light. And there are dozens of alternative reasons for the red-shift. Here are three…

    The speed of light is the speed vibrations travel along the strings. The frequency is something different… that would be the number of vibrations per second, i.e. the note or the color perceived.

    For red and blue light etc. the waves would travel at the same speed but the blue light would have more waves (or beats) per second.

    ∿~∿~∿~∿~∿~∿~∿~∿~∿~∿~∿~∿~∿~∿~   <--- Blue Light

    ∿~~~∿~~~∿~~~∿~~~∿~~~∿~~~∿~~~∿~   <--- Red Light

    <!–


    |
    |
    |
    |

    |
    |
    |
    |
    |
    |
    |
    |
    |

    |
    |
    |
    |
    |
    |
    |
    |
    |

    |

    |||||||||||||||||||||||

    –>

    There are billions and billions of stars and their fusion reactions are constantly dumping more and more of what we actually call space (flux particles) into space thereby either increasing the mass of space — OR — reducing the tension by adding extra particles to the field — OR — both.

    NOTE: In the suns fusion reaction the balled-up protons and neutrons (and attached electrons) would unball and detach thereby changing shape into the same particles that are used in the field in space. It’s that simple.

    Velocity of propagation equals the square root of the quantity Tension divided by the Mass per unit length…

    Tension = velocity squared x mass / length.

    1) Mass increase: As light travels through space, and space (the field) itself is getting thicker and thicker (more dense over billions of years), it of course will slow the frequency of light. Even if all light from all stars started out in a field of the same density, the further it has to travel means the more thickening it must go through and be slowed down in speed.

    When we look back in time through a telescope we don’t see the speed of light from a star billions of light years away, we see the speed of light after it has traveled and slowed through the thick field right next to us.

    Special Note: “Mass increase” (of space) means the amount of actual material (or particles).


    You cannot see anything 15 billion light years away — OR — 15 billion years ago. You only see the light that has traveled (actually through time and space) to right here right now.

    2) Tension reduction: If the tension is being lowered due to an increase in particles added to the field that would change the speed of light itself, actually slowing it down. And that in turn would also slow down the frequencies and red-shift light. If it is an on going process it means that light starting out in a high tension field would keep getting lower and lower in frequency as time goes by. The further back you look through a telescope the more drop in tension the light has had (getting here) and the more red-shifted it would be.

    The scary thing about the tension model is… the tension keeps getting less and less.

    If the tension was 10 Newtons at 10 billion years ago, then 9 Newtons at 9 billion years ago… that means there is going to be a time where the tension drops right off the scale to zero and there is no tension. You could actually call that being caught in the moment (and it would last for ever.) The field tension is directly responcible for vibrations and their speed, and although it is completely variable is how we perceive time.

    If vibrations stop… everything would stop… including time.

    NOTE: amount of Newtons used was only to make it easy to explain.

    |-10-|-9-|-8-|-7-|-6-|-5-|-4-|-3-|-2-|-1-|-0-| <— Tension & years ago

    <!–

    |---1---|---2---|---3---|---4---|---  <--- Billions of Years

    ∿∿∿~∿~∿~∿~
    ∿~~∿~~∿~~~∿~~~~∿~~~~
    –>

    ∿∿∿∿∿∿∿∿~∿~∿~∿~~∿~~∿~~~∿~~~∿~~~~∿----   <- Tension Mass Change

    The field tension is the sole reason for vibrations… and that is energy.

    Even the smallest amount of tension would be fine… as long as it is not zero because without tension (think of a tennis net) the field would become loose and floppy and every thing would just stop.

    3) String length: The field in space has basically the same tension everywhere.
    The distances to some stars is of course further than others.
    This would have the same effect as playing a longer vm violin string and getting a lower note.
    Light would still transfer at the same speed but an overall increased string length (of course) lowers the frequency.

    NOTE: The Big Bang Singularity supposedly had tremendous (or infinite) energy. That cannot be correct. Energy is vibrations, if everything was compressed into a Big Bang singularity, nothing could vibrate.

    Think of a truckload of guitar strings… they would not be able to vibrate,
    it would just be a big inert (vibration-less) lump.

    <!–
    TL = mc^2

    mc^2 = TL

    c^2 = TL / m

    c = square root (TL / m)

    The speed of light equals the square root of the quantity… tension of space times the length of string divided by the mass of space.

    TL = mc^2

    |--inch--|

    E = TL = mc^2
    Energy = Tension * Length = Mass * Velocity squared

    p.s.
    The speed of light “c” is how fast the vibration travels

    The frequency is the number of vibrations (like cycles per second)

    v = √( F / u ) if the mass increases the speed goes down.

    –>

     

    Spatial Expansion?

    Ummm… No!

    Imagine an orange or grapefruit floating in space and then the space around it expands.

    What happens to the grapefruit…? Nothing, it does not move.

    The supposed expansion has to be happening on all sides

    Can the field push or pull matter…?
    It would have to be pushing or pulling on all sides.

    ---> ● <---



    ---- ● ----

    Push on both sides of an orange really hard…

    ---> ● <---

    Which way did it move? Whoooops, it didn’t move.

    Above is an example with one object and space supposedly expanding.

    Notice with one object it is very easy to see nothing is going to move.

    But when you add more than one object into the scenario you might get fooled into thinking objects will move…

    Here is how it looks with more than one orange (object), look at it as a whole and then look at individual objects.

    ● ● ● ● ●

    Add pressure or increase field strength… the field will just get thicker.

    ● ● ● ● ●

    No movement, no change in distance between matter

    Net effect? Nothing.

    Easy Analogy:

    Imagine a bunch of oranges on a table in a room and then you pressurize the room…

    Will the oranges move apart from each other? Of course not.

    If expanding space is causing a flowing in one direction… then space would just flow around any object. The object will not move. And even if flowing space could move objects… the objects would not expand away from each other. They would just move away from the point of flow origin. That would mean there is spot in space that creates flow. And it would also mean there would be a spherical outward-from-center flow, with less and less flow further out in the sphere (more area to cover with same initial amount of flow). That just doesn’t work.

    If space is expanding uniformly… the expansion would be on all sides of any object and nothing would move.

    Anyway you look at it nothing happens. The spatial expansion (more particles introduced into the system) cannot be happening in one spot and it cannot be happening everywhere at the same time. Neither will do the expansion.

    And you have to remember… we are talking about a particle field.

    It doesn’t matter what the individual particles actually are. You would need a continuously attached group in order to do something. You can pull on a string attached to a kite and reel it in. But there is no way to could push a kite away with an attached group of string particles (or any type particles). Pushing away with a field only works with same pole magnets and very short distance.

    Pulling (gravity) works because you can have tension on the particles between matter.

    It’s simple… the field has an overall tension on it coming from infinity (that could be considered dark energy) and any
    objects in the field of course will have a higher tension between them (there are more field connections) — once again, that’s gravity.

     

    Quantum Friction?

    Space is just the field of strings. (not the string theory type)

    Friction is just a transfer of energy (that’s a particle vibration) to something else, and at quantum level there cannot be friction… it is a large scale thing.

    A vibrating guitar string would lose energy to the guitar body or the air as sound, etc..

    A (quantum) vibration can’t get off (leave) the strings. (not the string theory type)

    The string itself is vibrating and air is made from the same strings.

    It can be thought of like a string vibrating in completely empty space. There is nothing there to stop the vibration. And the vibration can only transfer to other strings.

     

    Supernova Neutrino Constraint…

    Everything is made from a high tension string particle field (not the string theory type).

    As easy to visualize 2-D model would be a highly stretched tennis net made of the finest spiders web silk thread.

    The speed of light is the speed vibrations travel through the net.

    Mass is a (proton / neutron / electron) package with proton and neutron threads balled up and attached to the electron. The whole package is attached to the net (at one of the plus sign + intersections) by a string twist coming from the outer electron.

    A Neutrino would be a balled up piece of silk thread not attached to the net.



    ---+---+---∗~~●●●●~~∗---+---+---

    The balled up neutrino is of course so small is can zip right past mass and through the net completely unfettered.
    They are very hard to detect and their interaction with the field is almost negligible unless there is a supernova.

    When a star goes supernova a massive amount of Neutrinos are created and there is a massive shock-wave of the field released as vibrations.

    You can think of this as if you were holding one side of the tennis net and giving it a repeated up and down shake (in the same way you would shake a small rug to remove dirt and sand). A sign wave like vibration would travel along the net and bump some of the neutrinos into the same speed as the vibration… and that is the speed of light.

    They start out from the supernova by riding the massive shock wave like a surfer and then they are on their own.

    Neutrinos can have any speed.

    Although they are basically the same as a proton… they are not what is considered mass because they are not connected.

     

    P.S. Can you see the strings?

    No… You don’t actually “see” anything.

    Light vibrations from any object travel through the particle field to your eye.

    EYE~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~OBJECT

    The field is made of strings, all you are seeing is the piece of the string “x” immediately next to (actually touching) your eye.

    EYE(x)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~OBJECT

    And you are not actually seeing that piece of string (or field at) “x”

    You are only seeing how fast it is vibrating… the frequency.

    You can’t actually see the field, electrons, photons, or strings.

    You only get an image because all the different frequencies are perceived as different colors.

    The frequency of vibrations determines its color:

    4×10^14 Hz is red light,

    8×10^14 Hz is violet light,

    and between these (in the range 4 – 8×10^14 Hz) are all the other colors of the rainbow.

    If you “see” something red… you are actually only seeing 4×10^14 Hz.

    EYE(red)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(4×10^14 Hz)

    And if you’d like to get even more insanerer…

    I can’t even think of a way to ever actually supposedly see the strings themselves (even taking into account you only see vibrations and frequency).

    Example: If we replace the OBJECT with a group of 6 strings (~~~~~~) you will understand what I mean…

    EYE(x)~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~(~~~~~~)

    The strings are what is used to convey light (vibrations)… how are you going to see what is used to convey vibrations?
    It’s a double whammy. If you look through a telescope you will see the stars… you will not see the telescope. You are using the telescope to see things with.

    In other words… you can’t see something that is used to see.

     

    What are Strings made from?

    <!–
    What are the strings made from?
    –>

    …that’s a mind bender.

    Oxygen has 8 protons, 8 neutrons and 8 electrons making a total of 24 particles per atom.

    Aluminum — number 13 — would have a total of 39 particles.

    Gold — number 79 — would have 237 particles.

    The properties of elements are known with great precision but they are in actuality just a different number of the same thing (that is true regardless of the theory).

    Somethings might be soft, hard, liquid, gas, solid, different colors, magnetic, rubbery, stiff, etc. but they are all just a different number of the same particle. You don’t know the properties of it… you only know the properties of a large group of it.

    In other words… even though you might know a string has a string-like shape, you can’t know what the string is made from because it is what is used to make things.

    A different number (amount) of the exact same thing makes completely different things (elements.)

    If you do a chemical test and you find out something is Aluminum… you have only found out there are 39 string particles in a group… not what the actual strings are.

    So, it (a string) is not an element and cannot be like any element or molecule unless it is by pure coincidence.

    The string (purely by happenstance) might be just like a bendable but non-stretchable fishing line or spiders web. But they also might be something that is completely inconceivable and unknowable to humans.

    Also… when you look at Gold you can see it has a nice color, correct? No, gold is a group of atoms made from 237 particles each. And those particles are made from strings.

    Color is only the frequency of vibrations that are traveling to your eye along the strings. No matter what you are looking at you are only seeing a different vibrational frequency from a different number of strings in a group.

    Could a string actually have a color anyway? Or even be white, black or grey? I have absolutely no idea. I’m sure it cannot be invisible though, because…
    for something to be invisible it would mean that light passes through it. And light is only a vibration coming from that same type of string. There isn’t anyway to see it but it is not invisible.

     

    Everything is correct with Math…

    I like math. You can describe anything you want with it.

    Think about all the theories in physics that are opposite or oppose each other.

    They all use intricate, exacting math equations to describe the theory in question.

    But since we can be sure only one theory has a slight chance of being be correct… that means all the rest are flat out wrong and at least 90% of the math used is describing nothing more than a fantasy (or a cranky theory).

    Got it? Even if you can back up your theory with math… it doesn’t mean a thing.

    You can make anything appear correct using math.

    hmmm… yes, that is the problem.

    Idiots come up with wacky math equations then try to make the Universe fit it.

    Then idiots who understand the math are fooled into thinking it is correct because they understand it.

    It should be the other way around… get a good idea of what is really going on then formulate some math equation and see if it also fits mathematically… but that’s the original problem, you can make anything seem correct mathematically.

    So what is the real problem?

    That’s easy… idiots are (and always were) the problem.

    And remember… Math does not describe reality.

     

    Math does not describe reality.

    If you have an equation for a sphere, it is mapping out a solid sphere…

    Nothing is Solid (except something like a neutron star, protons and neutrons are supposedly solid but they might just have a very loose string pack)

    A “reality” math would be based on strings and commandeering sections of space.

    In a 3-D world (only XYZ axis) a 1 x 1 x 1 cube would look like picture below.

     

             __        __

            /\ \      /\_\

            \ \ \    / / /

             \ \ \  / / /

              \ \ \/ / /

       ________\_\/ / /________

      /\__________\/_/_________\

      \/__________/\ \_________/

               / /\ \ \

              / / /\ \ \

             / / /  \ \ \

            / / /    \ \_\

            \/_/      \/_/

            ____________

           /\           \

          /  \           \

         /    \           \

        /      \           \

       /        \           \

      /          \___________\ 

      \          /           /

       \        /           / 

        \      /           /

         \    /           /

          \  /           /

           \/___________/ 

    The 3-D axis shape on the left is actually the string cube. The amount of space it commandeers is the cubic region on the right. Remember… Nothing is solid.

    The graphic below would be a “reality” 2-D plane. It would be made of only the XY axis particles attached together.

    Any masses in the field will of course have / develop more connections and pull together.

    NOTE: The mass(es) in this scenario / instance would be balled up XY axis particles. Everything is the same construct.


    ++++++++++++++++++++

    ++++++‡++++++‡++++++

    ++++‡‡●‡‡‡‡‡‡●‡‡++++

    ++++++‡++++++‡++++++

    ++++++++++++++++++++

    The field lines from any particle will go off in every direction but of course two masses in proximity will have a stronger tension between them than the field line tension coming from infinity.

     

    NOTE: This does not mean that all math is wrong.

    How fast is a car traveling? That’s easy… meters per second, and m / s is absolutely correct…

    But things with a volume in them… technically nothing is solid so the answers you get are not even in the ballpark.

    Dimensions...

    ........mass = [M] = kilograms

    ......length = [L] = meters

    ........time = [T] = seconds

    ...frequency = [T^-1] = seconds ^-1

    .......speed = [L]/[T] ...... = m / s

    acceleration = [L]/[T^2] .... = m / s^2

    ....momentum = [M][L]/[T] ... = kg_m / s

    .......force = [M][L]/[T^2] . = kg_m / s^2

    ......energy = [M][L^2]/[T^2] = kg_m^2 / s^2

    The one inch equation below is acceptable (defines actual reality) even though it is using regular math because it is actually a string tension equation (non-solid).

    Notice there is no width. And the mass used is the theoretical mass of a 1-D electron string.

    NOTE: The ” T ” in the equation… TL = mc^2 …below is tension and that’s a force.

    NOTE: The [T]'s inside brackets below are [time]

    Tension times Length is equal to Energy.

     

     TL = mc^2

    |--inch--|

    tension [M][L]/[T^2] * length [L] = mass [M] * speed c^2 [L^2]/[T^2]

     

    Nothing Is Solid II

    Atoms are mostly empty space.

    Space is not empty… it has a particle field.

    An (helium) atom has 2 protons, 2 neutrons and 2 electrons.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atom

    The volumetric difference between nucleus and shell would be 1 quadrillion. (1 then 15 zeros)

    So on a scale from…

    Zero to 1,000,000,000,000,000

    literally nothing is zero and

    literally solid is one quadrillion…

    ZERO     Thousand   Million   Billion  Trillion  Quadrillion

     ¦          ¦          ¦          ¦          ¦          ¦

     |----------|----------|----------|----------|----------|
    <!--

      \↖
    -->

    The helium atom would only be a notch above zero (zilch) at 1.

    And that helium atom is using 6 particles.

    The field in space commandeering the same amount of space as the atom would be using only one particle (with nothing balled up into the nucleus) and would be some percentage even less than 1

    Nothing is solid and space is not empty… on the scale of solidity what you think is a solid object and what you think is empty space are approximately just about the same, approximately almost nothing.

    Solids are actually almost nothing and space (the field in it) is just slightly more than nothing

     

    Worm Hole.   

    Yes… something like a worm hole is possible but it would not be like what you might think.

    Read time first.

    Space has an all encompassing field of connected string particles. (not the string theory type)

    A “Worm Hole” would be a completely empty “void” tunnel (with no particles) going through the field.

    If you have one that is connected between the Earth and Moon… you can get into your rocket sled and build up a lot of speed then shoot into the tunnel.


    ++++++++++++++++++++

    ++++++++++++++++++++

           >>===>

    ++++++++++++++++++++

    ++++++++++++++++++++

    When you are inside you are completely disconnected from everything that we know of as reality.

    No particle field with vibration, no light, no gravity, no time, etc.

    The speed of light is the speed vibrations travel through the field (of strings) and that is actually not very fast.

    The only reason we think it is fast is because we are completely immersed in the field, our brains are using (working at) the same speed and everything is proportional.

    You will have enough inertia to easily get to the Moon (there is nothing to slow you down or change your speed). And although you are traveling at the speed of the rocket sled (maybe 1,000 kph) inside the (disconnected) tunnel… you are actually traveling at a speed maybe greater than the speed of light relative to the people back on Earth (still connected to the field).

    So, you shoot into the worm hole tunnel and spend about 2 weeks traveling to the Moon but everyone on Earth sees you enter the tunnel then immediately exit on the Moon.

     

    Time.

    There are actually two different types of time.

    <!–
    Here is a quick explanation below…

    –>

    1) Ultimate Time: If you removed all matter and energy (all particles) from the universe and were left with only an observer (for instance Einstein) and his pocket watch… would time still exist?

    Yes… that is ultimate time in a null universe. This would be unchangeable constant flow.

    2) Field Time: As soon as you step back into the what Einstein calls 4-D space-time (FPT field with tension on it) everything is completely regulated by the field tension. This is completely variable.

    The field tension is the universal cosmic speedometer.

    If the tension goes up… gravity goes up, and so does the speed of light and everything else with it.

    That includes any type of measuring device and the speed your brain is working.

    Increase or decrease tension and it changes everything along with it, that’s all electro-magnetic phenomena, vibrations… everything.

    It’s like being a character in a movie and you don’t know the speed the projector is running… fast, slow, stop, start… you don’t know.

    Net effect: you might not notice anything.

    But if you could remove yourself from the projector, take a step away from everything and take a look back, you would see the speed everything is happening.

    If the tension has been changing over billions and billions of years… this would be readily visible as red-shifted light.

    I’m talking about something completely independent from everything.

    Like H. George Wells sitting in the time machine.

    Anything Einstein said or proved is completely irrelevant to George.

    George can see things happening at all kinds of different speeds… and everyone else is completely unaware of it.

    The same thing can be happening without a time machine.

    There is no way to know the speed things are really happening.

    If everything is happening very slowly so is the way the brain sees it.

    You have to think a level or two deeper to understand and most people can’t.

    There was an episode of STV with a planet with fast time. The inhabitants of the planet were completely unaware they were moving so fast. Same thing is true for anyone / everything… there is no way to know your true speed (unless someone / something comes along with different speed… but you still won’t know the true speed… you will only know your speed is different than someone else’s.

    For true speed you have to remove yourself from everything (the field), take a look back and hope there is a noticeable change in speed in the field time (or figure out how to negate the field time your body might still be using).

    3) Planck Time? (this might take a while)

    “A new scientific truth does not triumph by convincing its opponents and making them see the light, but rather because its opponents eventually die, and a new generation grows up that is familiar with it.” — Max Planck



    click for massive spinner


    TL = mc^2

    |--inch--|

                         ●

           ---+---+---∗~~●●●●~~∗---+---+---

    deutsch
    russian
    italiano
    svenska
    francais

    mcc = e = lt …McCelt






     

    The particle itself would be just the grey strings in the picture (no color and a lot thinner of course).

    It would fit perfectly inside of a dodecahedron.

    Actual string length is about one Ångström and it is fine enough were 10 strings (20 radii) could curl-up into the size of a neutron.

    //page_counter(jcount);






     







    The McCelt Tartan

    var tartanx=1;
    function tartan(){

    if (( tartanx%2) == 0){
    document.getElementById(‘whitebox’).style.background = ‘url(mccelt-tartan.png) repeat’;
    } else {
    document.getElementById(‘nnn’).style.background = ‘url(mccelt-tartan.png) repeat’;
    }//
    if (( tartanx%3 ) == 0 && tartanx!= 0 ){
    document.getElementById(‘bubg’).style.background = ‘url(mccelt-tartan.png) repeat’;
    }//

    if (( tartanx%4 ) == 0 && tartanx!= 0 ){
    document.getElementById(‘nnn’).style.background = ‘url(bgrd_tile.gif) repeat’;
    document.getElementById(‘whitebox’).style.background = ‘#ffffff’;
    document.getElementById(‘bubg’).style.background = ‘#eee’;

    }//

    tartanx++ ; //alert(tartanx)
    }//

    Particle fits perfectly inside
    dodecahedral space pack

    <!–

    Get your own
    FREE website


            ____________

           /\  ________ \

          /  \ \______/\ \

         / /\ \ \  / /\ \ \

        / / /\ \ \/ / /\ \ \

       / / /__\ \ \/_/__\_\ \

      / /_/____\ \___________\ 

      \ \ \____/ / ________  /

       \ \ \  / / /\ \  / / /  

        \ \ \/ / /\ \ \/ / /

         \ \/ / /__\_\/ / /

          \  / /______\/ /

           \/___________/ 


    Example...

    E = mc^2

    [M][L^2]/[T^2] = [M]([L]/[T])^2

    the dimensions of both sides are equal

    =====================

    Dimensions...

    mass = [M] = kilograms

    length = [L] = meters

    time = [T] = seconds

    speed = [L]/[T] = m / s

    acceleration = [L]/[T^2] = m / s^2

    momentum = [M][L]/[T] = kg_m / s

    force = [M][L]/[T^2] = kg_m / s^2

    energy = [M][L^2]/[T^2] = kg_m^2 / s^2

    --      ____________
           /\  ________ \
          /  \ \______/\ \
         / /\ \ \  / /\ \ \
        / / /\ \ \/ / /\ \ \
       / / /__\ \ \/_/__\_\ \
      / /_/____\ \___________\ 
      \ \ \____/ / ________  /
       \ \ \  / / /\ \  / / /  
        \ \ \/ / /\ \ \/ / /
         \ \/ / /__\_\/ / /
          \  / /______\/ /
           \/___________/  
    
    
    
    --      ____________
           /\           \
          /  \           \
         /    \           \
        /      \           \
       /        \           \
      /          \___________\ 
      \          /           /
       \        /           /  
        \      /           /
         \    /           /
          \  /           /
           \/___________/  
    
    
    
    
    
    +------+.      +------+       +------+       +------+      .+------+
    |`.    | `.    |\     |\      |      |      /|     /|    .' |    .'|
    |  `+--+---+   | +----+-+     +------+     +-+----+ |   +---+--+'  |
    |   |  |   |   | |    | |     |      |     | |    | |   |   |  |   |
    +---+--+.  |   +-+----+ |     +------+     | +----+-+   |  .+--+---+
     `. |    `.|    \|     \|     |      |     |/     |/    |.'    | .'
       `+------+     +------+     +------+     +------+     +------+'
    
     	
       .+------+     +------+     +------+     +------+     +------+.
     .' |    .'|    /|     /|     |      |     |\     |\    |`.    | `.
    +---+--+'  |   +-+----+ |     +------+     | +----+-+   |  `+--+---+
    |   |  |   |   | |    | |     |      |     | |    | |   |   |  |   |
    |  ,+--+---+   | +----+-+     +------+     +-+----+ |   +---+--+   |
    |.'    | .'    |/     |/      |      |      \|     \|    `. |   `. |
    +------+'      +------+       +------+       +------+      `+------+
    
     	
       .+------+     +------+     +------+     +------+     +------+.
     .' |      |    /|      |     |      |     |      |\    |      | `.
    +   |      |   + |      |     +      +     |      | +   |      |   +
    |   |      |   | |      |     |      |     |      | |   |      |   |
    |  .+------+   | +------+     +------+     +------+ |   +------+.  |
    |.'      .'    |/      /      |      |      \      \|    `.      `.|
    +------+'      +------+       +------+       +------+      `+------+
    
    
    
    
                 __        __
                /\ \      /\_\          
                \ \ \    / / / 
                 \ \ \  / / /
                  \ \ \/ / /
           ________\_\/ / /________  
          /\__________\/_/_________\
          \/__________/\ \_________/
                   / /\ \ \  
                  / / /\ \ \ 
                 / / /  \ \ \ 
                / / /    \ \_\
                \/_/      \/_/
    
    


    ←↑→↓↔↕↖↗↘↙↚↛↜↝↞↟
    ↠↡↢↣↤↥↦↧↨↩↪↫↬↭↮↯↰↱↲↳↴↵↶↷↸↹↺↻↼↽↾↿
    ⇀⇁⇂⇃⇄⇅⇆⇇⇈⇉⇊⇋⇌⇍⇎⇏⇐⇑⇒⇓⇔⇕⇖⇗⇘⇙⇚⇛⇜⇝⇞⇟
    ⇠⇡⇢⇣⇤⇥⇦⇧⇨⇩⇪⇫⇬⇭⇮⇯⇰⇱⇲⇳⇴⇵⇶⇷⇸⇹⇺⇻⇼⇽⇾⇿
    ∀∁∂∃∄∅∆∇∈∉∊∋∌∍∎∏∐∑−∓∔∕∖∗∘∙√∛∜∝∞∟
    ∠∡∢∣∤∥∦∧∨∩∪∫∬∭∮∯∰∱∲∳∴∵∶∷∸∹∺∻∼∽∾∿
    ≀≁≂≃≄≅≆≇≈≉≊≋≌≍≎≏≐≑≒≓≔≕≖≗≘≙≚≛≜≝≞≟
    ≠≡≢≣≤≥≦≧≨≩≪≫≬≭≮≯≰≱≲≳≴≵≶≷≸≹≺≻≼≽≾≿
    ⊀⊁⊂⊃⊄⊅⊆⊇⊈⊉⊊⊋⊌⊍⊎⊏⊐⊑⊒⊓⊔⊕⊖⊗⊘⊙⊚⊛⊜⊝⊞⊟
    ⊠⊡⊢⊣⊤⊥⊦⊧⊨⊩⊪⊫⊬⊭⊮⊯⊰⊱⊲⊳⊴⊵⊶⊷⊸⊹⊺⊻⊼⊽⊾⊿
    ⋀⋁⋂⋃⋄⋅⋆⋇⋈⋉⋊⋋⋌⋍⋎⋏⋐⋑⋒⋓⋔⋕⋖⋗⋘⋙⋚⋛⋜⋝⋞⋟
    ⋠⋡⋢⋣⋤⋥⋦⋧⋨⋩⋪⋫⋬⋭⋮⋯⋰⋱⋲⋳⋴⋵⋶⋷⋸⋹⋺⋻⋼⋽⋾⋿
    ⌀⌁⌂⌃⌄⌅⌆⌇⌈⌉⌊⌋⌌⌍⌎⌏⌐⌑⌒⌓⌔⌕⌖⌗⌘⌙⌚⌛⌜⌝⌞⌟
    ⌠⌡⌢⌣─━│┃┄┅┆┇┈┉┊┋┌┍┎┏┐┑┒┓└┕┖┗┘┙┚┛├┝┞┟
    ┠┡┢┣┤┥┦┧┨┩┪┫┬┭┮┯┰┱┲┳┴┵┶┷┸┹┺┻┼┽┾┿
    ╀╁╂╃╄╅╆╇╈╉╊╋╌╍╎╏═║╒╓╔╕╖╗╘╙╚╛╜╝╞╟
    ╠╡╢╣╤╥╦╧╨╩╪╫╬╭╮╯╰╱╲╳╴╵╶╷╸╹╺╻╼╽╾╿
    ▀▁▂▃▄▅▆▇█▉▊▋▌▍▎▏▐░▒▓▔▕▖▗▘▙▚▛▜▝▞▟
    ■□▢▣▤▥▦▧▨▩▪▫▬▭▮▯▰▱▲△▴▵▶▷▸▹►▻▼▽▾▿
    ◀◁◂◃◄◅◆◇◈◉◊○◌◍◎●◐◑◒◓◔◕◖◗◘◙◚◛◜◝◞◟
    ◠◡◢◣◤◥◦◧◨◩◪◫◬◭◮◯◰◱◲◳◴◵◶◷◸◹◺◻◼◽◾◿
    ☀☁☂☃☄★☆☇☈☉☊☋☌☍☎☏☐☑☒☓☔☕☖☗☘☙☚☛☜☝☞☟
    ☠☡☢☣☤☥☦☧☨☩☪☫☬☭☮☯☰☱☲☳☴☵☶☷☸☹☺☻☼☽☾☿
    ♀♁♂♃♄♅♆♇♈♉♊♋♌♍♎♏♐♑♒♓♔♕♖♗♘♙♚♛♜♝♞♟
    ♠♡♢♣♤♥♦♧♨♩♪♫♬♭♮♯♰♱
    –>

     
  • xulfrepus 6:33 pm on December 20, 2010 Permalink | Reply
    Tags: Tension of Space   

    Update: Here is the answer for Tension of Space:

    Tension of Space: T = mc^2/L

    Everything is made from strings. The basic particle is 10 strings joined at their centers (or 20 radii). When they are balled up they are a proton or neutron. The individual radii (1 of 20 strings) are the connectors used to connect neutron to protons (balled up) and proton to electrons (full length but twisted together).

    An electron is shaped like the metal spines of an umbrella (without the hinges or fabric of course). One string extents from were your hand would hold it up to the center of axis. There, eighteen strings (or radii) extent out in the same type shape as the umbrella. The last string goes straight up (the same length as all the rest) and connects with the field in space (space is made of the same stuff by the way. This same basic particle (with nothing balled up or twisted) is also the strings used in free space for conveyance of light and gravity).

    (N)-(P)— — — — — — — — — — — — - E — — — — — — — — — — —

    The mass of a proton is 1 amu.
    The length of 2 radii (or the diameter of an atom) is one angstrom.
    That is the equivalent of one string connection in any given direction.
    The mass of the 2 radii is 2/20 amu (or 1/10 of the proton).
    The speed of light is well known.

    Formula for Tension = velocity squared * mass / length.

    The really cool thing is you can google this…
    (speed of light ^ 2 * .1 amu) / 1 angstrom

    and the google calculator pops up with the correct answer for the tension of space…

    ((the speed of light^2) * .1 amu) / (1 angstrom) = 0.14924179 newtons

    Can this be theoretically correct? I thought about this some more… If you have 2 weights pulling tension on a string.
    There would be no way to know the density of the string between them (even if the weights are made of the same type string material). If the string was thick or thin the tension would remain the same. This is what troubled me about just dividing the proton into 20 pieces and using that number as the mass. Although the proton is made from the same string material… the string (mass) itself is not dependent on that.
    Whatever the string is made from can’t actually be equated directly with mass. It is the smallest scale universal substance.

    But then I thought of another possible solution… the difference in the neutron and proton mass. That might actually be the closest mass number available for a string. If the neutron – proton difference is one string radius then 2 of them will equal the atomic diameter.

    So I used that in the equation… T = mc^2/L

    Tension = c^2 * (2 (neutron mass – proton mass)) divided by angstrom length

    speed of light ^ 2 * (2(1.67490 * 10^-27 kg – 1.67260 * 10^-27 kg)) / 1 angstrom

    google (speed of light ^ 2 * (2 * (1.67490 * 10^-27 kg – 1.67260 * 10^-27 kg)) / 1 angstrom

    All of the neutron strings are balled up. The proton has one string attaching to the electron. That is why it is slightly less mass.
    It is not 1/ 20th because the individual string mass is the “universal substance” not the same as what is called proton mass.

    Here is the google result by the way…
    google ((the speed of light^2) * (2 * ((1.67490 * ((10^(-27)) kg)) – (1.67260 * ((10^(-27)) kg))))) / (1 angstrom) = 0.00413427382 newtons

    The only other alternative available at the moment is electron mass, But that has charge on it and it is also attached to the proton. I think the neutron minus proton is the one to go with.

    Mass

    Mass… for instance something that has a proton, is a particle with strings balled up.
    It doesn’t actually convert into energy… it releases what can be considered its energy by un-balling.
    The particle is still there but now its shape has changed into the regular particle (un-balled) 10 strings with common center (or 20 radii).

    The energy contained in the nucleus of an atom is actually only potential energy.

    It is the same as a balled of group of proton strings with other field strings pulling tension on them from multiple directions. When something like a reaction happens and the balled up proton strings can unwind… the field strings will pull (actually snap) all of the proton strings to their full length (that’s the same length as the field strings) going from the size of a proton to commandeering the volumetric size an atom takes up in space. This instantly creates the massive disruption (instant extra field particle strings) in the particle field in one spot and the electro-magnetic pulse.

    Note: this is not the same as accelerating protons in the LHC. There, the protons actually do have energy because they are moving and smashing together.

    Dark Energy — Everything is pulled on equally from all directions by the field.

    Gravity — When 2 masses are introduced into the field they form endpoints and pull together.

    Dark Matter — That’s the field itself… it is made from the same particles as everything else, it has mass but can’t be seen (it is what is used to convey light and pull objects together).

    All of this is actually easily explained with that new formula… T = mc^2/L

    And if we multiply both side by Length…

    TL = mc^2
    Tension * Length = mass * speed of light squared

    That means the Tension of the strings in space times their length is equal to their energy.

    “speed of light ^ 2 * .1 amu” …notice it’s the same as mc^2

    speed of light^2 * .1 atomic mass units = 1.4924179 × 10^-11 joules

    I guess this is why the speed of light is involved in Einsteins mass energy equivalence equation… E=mc^2

    I always wondered why… now I know

    It had to be something mechanical… tension and string lengths!

    for anyone that didn’t notice the point, both sides of the new equation TL = mc^2 are equal to Energy…

    E = TL = mc^2
    Energy = Tension * Length = Mass * Velocity squared

    p.s.
    The speed of light “c” is how fast the vibration travels

    The frequency is the number of vibrations (like cycles per second)

    TL = mc^2

    mc^2 = TL

    c^2 = TL / m

    c = square root (TL / m)

    The speed of light equals the square root of the quantity… tension of space times the length of string divided by the mass of space.

    Note: The Universe must be made of something. This theory assumes the basic unit of Universal Substance is a one-dimensional string. Nothing is Solid. Space is not Empty.

     
  • xulfrepus 10:44 pm on November 23, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    by James Clifford Cranwell 10/06/98 Part… 

    by James Clifford Cranwell 10/06/98 Part VII … Miscellaneous

    parallel dimension :
    We can only see things in our continuum, vibrations in a direction toward us along the strings. The nucleus radius to electron orbital volumetric empty space ratio is one quadrillionth ( 1 / 1,000,000,000,000,000 ). Since the flux in free space are not curled into supposed nuclear mass, they can assume or commandeer more free space volume… there’s not even a proton radius to contend with now. That makes the free space in the Flux particle field greater than 99.9999999999999% … there can be an almost infinite amount of material in the free space between the strings (infinity minus the one quadrillionth infinity field). So anything small enough (a Neutrino) can be in or out of our space time continuum thereby having a speed completely irrelevant to that of light and an existence completely irrelevant to ours (…easy to see how non-local phenomena can happen).
    The lattice structure of the fields also allows for one or more proximity fields without any intersection. This means mass can have parallel fields surrounding it and occupying the same space, creating an higher density. Anything that absorbs or reflects light (vibrations) or disrupts the field in some manner will have a discernible shape. Anything between the strings is invisible.
    There can be an independent field, A micro-swiss-cheese type mass or a fluidic type matter unconnected to the continuum, unaffected by light, gravity or matter… completely invisible to us. Unless there is an instantaneous change in Flux field dimension thereby rendering it momentarily visible, if (and only if) it can somehow actually connect and if it is even possible for there to be more than one type of matter.
    Question: can one or more axis or radii break away from the Flux, curl up, and become something? What would we call them?

    Superconductor :
    If you study anything, you change it. If you measure an electron, for instance, you will change the state of the electron by absorbing some / all of the electron energy vibrations into the measuring device. So, although it may be possible to create a frozen torus or donut shaped object with an almost perpetual electron current flowing through it, once the field created by said object is tapped for its current inducing magnetic field properties the source will simply drain or transfer like any other source of energy (it’s our old friend… cause and effect), you have to pay for your lunch.

    Time travel :
    Nope.

    Dark Matter :
    What they call “Dark Matter” is simply the field of flux particles completely filling space (explained in this theory).
    Can you see the field or particles? No, it would be like trying to “hear air”, you don’t hear air, you hear vibrations happening in the air. You can stick this whole scenario under water and it’s the same… you hear the sound of for instance a whale but you don’t hear the actual molecules of water. You hear the vibrations in the water.
    You can’t see a particle. You only see vibrations from the particles.
    Once again… if you hold a piece of rope, you have a rope. If you shake the rope, you have photons. If the rope is shaking at an high frequency, your eye will detect one pinpoint spot of blue color (from the end of the rope). If it’s a slower frequency your eye will pick up a red color. You never actually see the rope.

    Michelson-Morley Experiment :
    Michelson-Morley Experiment won’t work if the field is moving along with the experiment apparatus. It’s actually ridiculous. They thought it out pretty good but forgot one thing and it became garbage.
    Can any of you ding-dongs understand that? If you are on Earth, and there is a field directly connected to the earth, you can set up all kinds of mirrors and other things and twist and turn them and it just won’t matter because the field is moving with the earth.

    Molecular combiner:
    When there is a lack of vibration Flux particles are destined to curl and be confined as mass. To break them free from this restive state and set them in motion once again will take energy. So, to create matter you have to take away energy. This means a matter making machine or replicator will create a surplus of energy, not only from a proton and neutron combining one charged radius each and ejecting an electrons worth, also from whatever residual quantum fluctuations are left on the free flux particle before it is combined into a proton.
    Note: there are two completely separate and different ways to look at this (of course).
    One is combining atoms and molecules already in existence into different structures. The Other is somehow converting the actual field or particle strings into Protons and neutrons. If you have elements you can make anything. The question is how do you make Hydrogen out of supposed empty space.

    Casimir Effect:
    Zero Point Energy (ZPE), or vacuum fluctuation energy are terms used to describe the random electromagnetic oscillations that are left in a vacuum after all other energy has been removed. If you remove all the energy from a space, take out all the matter, all the heat, all the light… everything, you will find that there is still some energy left. The Flux, you can’t remove the flux, for it will always connect to any apparatus of evacuation thereby reviving itself. Any apparatus of evacuation or metal plates are made of atoms with orbiting electrons with charge.

    Entropy :
    Energy is just a mechanical vibration, these vibrations happen in this universe, they have no where else to go. They can divide into lower and lower frequencies, add together and change states but never dissipate into oblivion. It’s the cause and effect scenario once again, there isn’t anyway to stop a vibration because the stopper will be affected, thereby continuing the process.
    If there were an hypothetical edge to the flux particle field (hypothetical edge of the universe), vibrations would travel to the edge of the field, run out of particles, have no where to go and be completely reflected (180 degree phase change) back and almost focused. The same effect as a spherical mirror (assuming the edge is curved), thus creating the same effect as deep space telescope. Reflecting the light of possible nearby objects (observer to object) from a very distant past (object to edge of universe then all the way back to observer). Any pocket of space that is void of particles or any break in the field where vibrations cannot traverse has the same effect. Therefore energy remains.

    The Limit :
    Mathematical equations are a great way to describe the physical conditions and properties of Matter except when an infinity or a zero denominator is thrown into the equation, then it might not actually work in the real world. In the same way Zero Kelvin (negative 273.15 Celsius) is an absolute zero or a temperature limit and calculating molecular movements mathematically at for instance, negative 4001 Celsius would be ridiculous. The amount anything can compress to or exert force on also has a limit. You can write anything you want on paper but, mass isn’t going to collapse to a pinpoint and thereby make the gravity approach infinity.

    Raisin bread :
    The Raisin bread model of expansion is also a farce. It can’t expand because if the universe were a loaf, it would have to be an infinite sized loaf, or an infinite amount of loaves with no room left to expand.

    Anti-Matter :
    The proton-electron connector is of course strings and if it is considered regular matter they might have a left hand twist like so… ////////////////////

    So if it meets up with other regular matter, connects and there is tension on it, there won’t be any problems… //////////////////// ////////////////////

    but if it meets up with anti-matter with right hand twist (reverse chiralty) and there is a tension pull, they (everything) will be able to completely unwind. \\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ ////////////////////

    This releases their energy and converts the particles back into the normal state… no twists, nothing balled up.

     
  • xulfrepus 10:43 pm on November 23, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    The Big Bang Myth 

    by James Clifford Cranwell 4/19/98 Part VI … The Big Bang Myth

    Energy equals frequency ( E = hf )
    Area Increases, Energy must divide.

    Light energy wave vibrations expand spherically away from their point of origin (The Star). Also, the waves or vibrations are expanding away from each other. There is more and more area to cover with the same unit
    click for large picture of expanding waves

    amount of Energy.
    click for large picture of expanding waves

    What this means is light vibrations along the strings propagating through space will be divided to fill the ever increasing area. This is accomplished by a reduction in frequency or an increase in wavelength and is the reason for what is otherwise known as the Red shift (except of course some actual random movement). The further away, the greater the division or separation of particle vectors, the more red shift.

    The Universe isn’t expanding, although the fusion reaction in the sun and other stars does allow the release and expansion of billions and billions of Flux particles from confinement in nuclei back into their normal state. This excess amount will generate raw material for the formation of other matter elsewhere in the Universe and give space an ever changing star field by a type of cosmic convection. Stars radiate spherically. So, their energy, matter or light is distributed evenly throughout the cosmos. And since the light from all stars also converges or can be seen from any point in the Universe, this means we are a small part of everything in the Universe.
    The Universe extends to an inconceivable infinity. However far you go into Space there’s more Space, filled with Planets, Stars, and Galaxies with no place left to expand into… Think about it… the Universe can’t expand, it’s already there.
    Professor Stephen Hawking has blundered…
    This picture is from his book
    “a briefer history of time” page 29
    it’s easy to see the Waves getting further apart from each other as time increase.

    Big-Bang…not this time.
    There wasn’t a Big Bang. Everything can’t be assembled neatly in a package somewhere. You can’t do that with infinity. The Universe can’t collapse under its own forces. Everything is being pulled on from every direction (no matter how far a small mind thinks the edge of the universe is, there is still an infinity beyond). Nothing can assemble to a point where it contains everything.

    Thinking there was an original point of inception (Big Bang) and everything is racing away from it is the same as thinking the Earth is the center of the Universe and everything else revolves around it.

    Different distances will have different Red-Shift value
    Wavelength will increase at differing rates at different distances… greater initial shifts then less as sphere of light in any given direction increases (for all intents and purposes) to almost parallel. If Star S401 and Star G401 are absolutely motionless in relation to each other and the observer they will appear to have a different red-shift if they are at different distances. Our Sun is included although it can’t be regarded as a point source like the more distant stellar counterparts.

    Actual movement clouds the issue even further.
    Actual movement of Star relative to the observer will cause increase or decrease in amount of Red-Shift over a given time period. If Star R327 actually is racing away and the red shift is noted, then some time later its red shift is measured again and it has increased, it is not racing away faster… it’s racing away constant. Only the amount of energy its light has lost because of position has changed. Blue shifted starlight from an incoming Star can actually be red-shifted back to zero shift and falsely appear to have no movement.

    Other possible reasons:
    After traveling billions of miles and years, light just becomes tired and slows down.
    The suns fusion reaction is constantly increasing the mass of space by dumping more and more of what we actually call space (flux) into space thereby increasing its mass. Velocity of propagation equals the square root of the quantity Tension divided by the Mass per unit length … v = √( F / u ) if the mass increases the speed goes down.
    So, as light travels through space, and space itself is getting thicker and thicker (more dense), it of course will slow the frequency of light. Even if all light from all stars started out in a field of the same density, the further it has to travel means the more thickening is must go through and slow down in speed. When we look back in time through a telescope we don’t see the speed of light from a star billions of light years away, we see the speed of light after it has traveled and slowed through the thick field right next to us and all others.

    The point here is there can be perceived shift without actual movement.

    Quantum Weirdness:
    We are here… therefore an infinite Universe. There cannot be an edge or any type of end to the Universe. Any wall will always have something on the other side.

     
  • xulfrepus 10:42 pm on November 23, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    Relativity 

    by James Clifford Cranwell 2/01/98 Part V … Relativity

    If there were only two objects in the universe (hypothetical), an observer and the Earth, both completely weightless / massless. The observer would be tricked into thinking he / she has weight because of the gravitational tug and mass because of the large concentration of gravitational tug. In their reality there are only forces. The Mass of the actual Flux particle is negligible… it is substantial only when it has a vibration or a gravitational pull on it. Therefore Mass is only a vibration or a pull, it isn’t something we can actually take to the beach. Proof…

    Note: some of these examples are intended only to show a direct correlation or relationship between everything …inclusive

    E = mc2 (Energy equals Mass times the speed of light squared) and…
    E = hf (Energy equals frequency, h is constant).
    Therefore, we can replace E in the first equation with hf and get the result hf = mc 2
    When Mass is released as Energy it leaves the nucleus as Electrons traveling through free space at the speed of light, don’t forget, the Electron is two dimensions. So, Energy equals Mass traveling at the speed (or length) of light in two dimensions or E = mc2
    This can be thought of as the balled up strings of protons and neutrons (the mass) contained in the nucleus suddenly expanding, actually creating more of (what we call) space and vibrating away from center as 2-D electrons

    A quick textbook type dimensional analysis gives even further insight…
    The E or energy in this case is measured in joules with dimensions of [M][L2] / [T2]
    That’s mass times length squared divided by time squared
    The m part of the mc2 is mass with dimensions of [M]
    So far we have the energy part [M][L2] / [T2] = and the mass part [M]
    To make the right side equal the left we have to multiply the mass by [L2] / [T2]
    that’s length2 divided by time2 or meters2/seconds2
    Speed of light “c” is measured in meters per seconds [L] / [T]
    Squaring this we arrive at the needed [L2] / [T2]
    Is there anything that has the dimensional form [L2] / [T2] already?
    What did the gravitational constant look like?…….m3 kg-1 s-2 = [L3] / [M][T2] units

    In an atom, most of the Mass is contained in the nucleus. However, an Electron does have mass and the Proton / Electron mass ratio is 1836.1527556561 , As a result of this division we have canceled the strong force of light / gravity on four radii of the Electron-Proton combination in this example and we are left with 18 inanimate or inert radii of the Electron shell and the 18 curled radii of the Proton. Now we divide 1836.1527556561 by 10 square root26 (the exact value without the cancelled speed of light and gravity portion… negative one times speed of light, these were cancelled in the initial division) then divide by 36 (the number of curled radii and inert radii) and get the difference 1.0002755054517 …This means everyone’s measurements are correct to within two / ten thousandths and the ratio difference between 36 times 10 square root 26 and 1836.1527556561 is almost unity.
    E = mc2 :
    Energy equals Mass, speed of light squared is constant. As a result of the fusion reaction in the Sun, a tremendous amount of mass is converted to energy. Therefore, space is being filled with mass that has been converted or changed into energy. Since mass can be called particles and energy is the same as mass only in a different shape or state, we can say that space is filled with energy or particles, it isn’t a void.
    E = hf :
    Energy equals frequency, h is constant. If we consider any point in space, we realize it has frequency or energy traversing it from every direction, this same process is happening at every point in space. Therefore every point in space contains energy or mass. Therefore if the Earth can be considered to have mass, space has an actual mass and cannot be a void.
    E = hf = E = mc2 :
    hf and mc2 are both equal to E (energy),
    this means hf and mc2 are equal to each other … hf = mc2.
    h (plank) and c2 (Speed of light2) are dropable (ignorable) constants so,
    f = m (frequency equals mass), therefore frequency must have conveyance or a particle involved in its travels or else there will be nothing to contain energy when it converts back into mass. It works almost the same as electricity in wire. Particles are released from their mass or rest states and fill space at the speed of the solar wind. It is only the vibration effect conveyed on the particles that travels at the speed of light.
    Quantum Weirdness:
    The speed of light is only an effect created in the particle field. There shouldn’t be any problem traveling faster than it. Except… every type of propulsion now uses something related to the same electron field vibration speed, for instance, chemical changes, nuclear reactions or even some type of electrical/magnetic propulsion would still be using the same electron vibrational speed. How can you travel/go faster than something that you have to use to go?
    If you could travel fast enough to break free from field interactions you may find the speed of light incredibly slow (although there will be no way to discern this). A possible problem… once you have broken free from field interactions and are out of the space time continuum there is an absolute lack of reference frame and you become neutrino like with a speed and existence completely irrelevant to anything known. It may be impossible to re-enter or slow back into this space time.

     
  • xulfrepus 10:42 pm on November 23, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    Atomic Structures 

    by James Clifford Cranwell 3/12-14/98 Part IV … Atomic Structures

    Charmed
    It’s ludicrous to believe there was a Big-Bang, then billions and billions and billions etc. of groups of different type particles ( Muon, Alpha, Down, Electron, Lambda, Yada, Neutrino, Green, Blue, Eta, Red, Gluon, Tau, Pion, Kaon, Proton, Neutron, Sigma, Xi, Omega, Up, Strange, Photon, Charmed, Bottom, Top, Positron, Meson, Baryon, etc.) all magically formed themselves together into exact arrangements to become elements. How do they know how to arrange themselves without any external guidance?
    This mistakenly implies two things…
    No.1 morphic field : There is some kind of morphic field guidance system that arranges particles into matter as we know it, exact same structures every time. If this is so, then not only are there all these types of particles, there is also another field (morphic) to describe. The only difference here is the morphic field isn’t the effect created by electron movement and charge, it’s a field that controls everything, it’s the cause. That implies the morphic field has a brain or some other type of intelligence controlling it (perhaps yet another morphic field), that is quite impossible.
    No.2 pre-formed matter : All particles and atoms just happened to be already formed. Hydrogen, Iodine, Magnesium, Sulfur, Gold, Oxygen, Nitrogen, Silver, Krypton, Iron… you name it, it was already formed. If that’s the case, how did everything get formed? Was there a Morphic field? Were the heavier elements created in the hydrogen fusion of stars? Where did that hydrogen come from? Was there a Morphic Field?

    Cause and effect:
    For any action to take place there must be an underlying cause, something where the end result is the action in question. Therefore, we have to realize there must be something causing the cause, and something else causing the causing (the middle-man cause). This will tend toward infinity with no explanation of an initial cause unless of course there is something that behaves automatically in an exact manner when an outside influence affects it, an Automaton. If there is a vibration on it, it will expand or repel and convey the vibration (if something is vibrating it automatically shakes everything in proximity away).
    If there is a lack of vibration or state of rest it will curl up and pull. Now the whole thing is simple, at the quantum level or the actual beginning of particle interactions things have to be this simple, anything else implies and endless string of cause and effects. Thinking there is more than one type of particle in this Universe is ridiculous… if there is more than one type of particle and there isn’t an infinite number of particles, then there is an absolute number of different type particles, for instance twenty-nine or thirty-seven.
    How are all the different type particles magically finding each other in order to be formed into matter? Do they just happen to be in the right place at the right time billions and billions of times (for even the head of a pin) everywhere in the Universe? Is there a Morphic Field Cousin that moves matter from place to place and knows exactly how much matter to move and where to move it? What’s controlling this Morphic Field Cousin, a Morphic Field Uncle? The only questions here are… Why are there particles? What caused the initial vibrations or lack there of ?

    Basic Particle Construction:
    They’re right in front of our face, we’re made out of them, …Everything is made out of them. So, where did the basic flux particles come from and how were they formed? Although their ultimate creation or coming into existence is unexplainable there had to be some form of matter or substance from which everything was initially formed or else we wouldn’t be here. And the most efficient type of construct is the string, …if it’s just a coincidence, it’s the most amazing coincidence that ever happened.
    So… if we have a bunch of strings floating around how do they automatically form into the ten dimensional or twenty radii from center shape? That’s easy… if any strings join together at their ends and then more strings are attracted to the joint… it will build into the shape in question. When it reaches a point where there are twenty strings sticking into one center, that’s the point where no more strings will fit all the way into the center of the package, it’s the cut off point. It’s the vertices of the dodecahedron or the faces of the icosahedron …the flunot, center of axis. The flunot will automatically form then everything else will automatically form from it… it couldn’t have happened any other way.

    By the way:
    What are all those different particles their talking about? They’re just a certain amount of the string particles from a busted up proton, that’s why there’s a distinct ratio between all the supposed different particles MeV, something might be three strings broken off but still balled up together something else might be nine strings still balled up.

    Sub-Quanta:
    At the quantum level there isn’t anything we can actually perceive as color or shape. Color is a specific frequency (a photon) traveling along one or more of the Flux strings. All we are able to see are the vibrations in a direction toward us… not the string or particle itself.
    Analogy: we can use a voltmeter or a galvanometer to measure current or voltage through a wire, but there is no chance of the voltmeter or galvanometer seeing (actually looking at) the wire. An human brain, like the galvanometer, is just a measuring device and it is only measuring frequencies that we perceive as color. We can’t see the wire (flux strings).
    The electron radii are the spines of an umbrella like structure without the fabric (The fabric of space doesn’t have fabric). Light or vibration is conveyed to the atom then is added to the existing charge or vibration quantity until the threshold is exceeded and a quantum leap is made by adding other flux as connectors between electrons. This will give an instantaneous change in orbit or shell size.
    This process also changes the amount of repel or what we now know is actual “dimension” of individual particles in specific amounts. They can load or vibrate up to full 2-D charge, then upon discharge will be released in discrete packages or amounts and are called photons. Electrons travel through free space at the near the speed of light. The speed of light is a vibration along the Flux particle field.
    An Electron force is an actual shape conversion of the particles as it traverses (a pulse like snapping in and out of 2-dimensions ). That’s more work, so, it takes slightly longer. A stronger Electron force, for instance lightning, also has the effect of straightening out the zigzag property of the field lattice, thereby totally disrupting the proximity space-time.

    Quantum Mechanical:
    A force is something that causes action to take place. And although there can be any number of forces working in unison or opposition. There can also be a series, or one force that is a direct result of another force, “this caused that”. But, there is a limit to the number of forces that can be working in series, because there has to be an initial force or an ultimate beginning of any series. This can be quite perplexing, if we are at the ultimate beginning in the force series chain, there must be something causing the initial force. And it can’t be another force or else we are not at the beginning and there will never be an initial force or beginning. So the initial force can’t be a force at all. It can only be an intrinsic Mechanical vibration.

    Quantum Weirdness:
    At a size or realm smaller than the electron orbital radius itself, light doesn’t enter (light is only a vibration) . Only highly charged particles with velocity high enough to disconnect from the continuum can. Any scientific measurements made in this manner are actually accomplished outside of space-time.
    Any particle that has charge high enough to disconnect from the field will have a speed completely irrelevant to light or anything else. A particle is actually something, a photon is only a vibration on the particle.
    if you hold a piece of rope, you have a rope. If you shake the rope, you have photons. Does the shake or vibration have mass? If we use this as an example of an atom and magnify the nuclei (proton) until its size is proportional to the dot above the letter “i”, the ropes or strings would be like one silk strand of a spiders web (per proton) extending out a few hundred meters to the electron. It (the strand) would have to be fine/thin enough where eighteen or nineteen of them can curl up together into a spherical space the size of the proton, because they (the strands) actually are the proton.
    The speed one wave crest vibration travels along the string would be considered the speed of light. Any balled up string zipping by has little or no chance (31,415,926,535 to one)* of coming in contact with anything and completely irrelevant speed and existence.

    • 31,415,926,535 to one… that’s the area of one slice taken through the atom with the nucleus being the bull’s eye and the slice area equal to pi radius squared or pi 100,000 2 …
     
  • xulfrepus 10:41 pm on November 23, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    Gravity 

    by James Clifford Cranwell 4/01/98 Part III … Gravity

    As Star light travels through the Universe, what actually happens is a specific frequency or vibration (a photon) travels along one or more of the flux particle axes strings. The flux particles are arranged in a Field or matrix.
    The matrix is held in place by the gravitational effect (the attraction of particles to each other) and curved around any mass in proximity. Light energy or electro-magnetic expansive force adds to the rigidity of the field matrix, but no matter how great the strength of any individual segment of a lattice structure, it is easily folded up or warped by any other force, in this case Gravity.

    The Dodecahedron

    The Dodecahedron (DDH) is the pattern or axial arrangement used by the unit Flux. It is stackable hyperbolically and absolutely the most efficient way to pack space with the least amount of material (smallest angle of symmetrical invariance). Any more than ten axes per particle and they won’t connect.
    The only problem is the vertices are tri-linear (where any axis terminates it will intersect with three others). If a frequency traveling along an axis passes directly through the center, then out any of the tri-corners, that same linear direction will not pass through any other of the twelve Dodecahedrons in proximity. It will be directly on the edge where any four Dodecahedrons meet. So the individual Photon which we now know is one vibration traveling along the Unit Flux strings can never take a straight path. The vertices where the Dodecahedrons meet have four paths.
    If you place three base balls on the ground in a triangle then place another on top to make a pyramid shape, that will be the way the base balls and Dodecahedrons stack. The only problem here is where the base balls touch each other is not where the Unit Flux Strings are located. The end points the Flux Strings terminate on tri-corners. Thus sending the intrepid photon on a Zigzag, Corkscrew, and other intricate paths destined to scatter.
    It is easy to angle out of position with nothing else around. It is the combined effect of many photons initially heading in one direction with momentum that keep each other in line and in proper direction except of course near the scattering outer fringes. This is the reason why one photon particle traveling in a zigzag can also be interpreted as wave function. Its path is forced into a wave type motion. A vibration sets off resonant vibrations in itself, perpendicular to the original path. Thus creating other fields and background radiation.

    Graviton…38 Dimensions or 10-38 strength

    Drawn here with spherical encasement for clarity, this is the way Flux pack space and are compressed in proximity to a large mass. To complete one wave of pull the gravitational attractor charge takes on its journey, one complete wave of the zigzag must be used to stay in any given direction (remember the Flux axes intersect in groups of four).
    So for this package that’s nine dimensional Flux dispersal times four unit Flux or 10-36 strength, if only two paths are used through the group that makes the dimension of the group 10-38 or Gravity. If we replace the G in Newton’s equation F = Gm1m2 / r 2 with the exact value we get F = m1m2 / ((10 √26-1)c)r 2 then we can easily see the masses divided by the radius squared times the length in question equals the force of gravity.

    No problem curving light

    The flux particle field is held in place and curved around any mass in proximity and pulled in and compressed thanks to the lattice type arrangement of the vertices. If the gravitational force is strong enough (an infamous (supposed) Black Hole made entirely of protons or neutrons… same thing et.al.) the Flux will flatten down to an electron like 2-D shape with the normal or volt spike included in the fold, giving the surface structure of the Black Hole the same functionality and appearance as a giant Electron in space.
    Once again Newton’s equation F = Gm1m2 / r 2 breaks down and becomes ineffective, the whole particle field shape and dimension has changed. The overall composition could be considered a gigantic atom in space. The Flux are completely compressed at the surface but make a smooth interdimensional transition back to a point in normal space. This means not only will light escape or discharge but it will be an immensely brighter light than is possible as the result of any Stars Hydrogen fusion reaction.
    As you approach a Black Hole there will be a dramatic increase in gravity. The zigzag (lattice structure) of particle matrix axes increases, folding up like an accordion. The distance light has to travel increases thereby slowing it, compressing time and space along with it (from an unaffected observers reference frame). But it will take longer and longer to pass through the compressing field so, as the field compresses the overall effect is time will slow down and you will compress along with the field… you might not even notice (until it’s too late), you will not stretch out.
    (special note: Gravity is the attraction of particles pulling complete groups of atoms together. In a black hole there is a continuous proton / neutron pack and they have shedded their electrons. And although the protons / neutrons are held together with the strong force, i.e. one radius each curled up together, there is nothing to actually compress them together as a group. It would be something like a pearl necklace, any pearl might be strongly connected to its neighbor, but if you folded them up into a ball, there is nothing to collapse them together into a supposed singularity. They are connected but they are not pulling. )

    Cosmological Constant: Fifth Force : Dark Energy : Quintessence : Luminiferous Æther : The Aether

    The speed of waves of any system is given by the equation: Velocity “v” of propagation equals the square root of the quantity Tension “F” divided by the Mass “u” per unit length … v = √( F / u ), squaring both sides we have: v 2 = F / u .
    In our section of the universe, we know the velocity is the speed of light, so let’s assume c2 = F / u . Even though the values for tension and mass are unknown, it’s reasonable to assume the mass of space is vanishingly small. That makes the tension of the field tremendously greater than its mass (the ratio is the speed of light squared: 89,875,517,873,681,764 ).

    When any flux particle is in free space it has vibration or light energy from billions and billions of stars traversing it in every possible direction. Although every particle is attracted to every other particle… without any large force or vibration on one specific axis, every axis will repel or expand away from every other axis, attempting to expand the whole field to its greatest volume. This process can be considered a universal expansive force, the Fifth Force or Dark Energy.

    An easy to understand two dimensional model of the Flux Particle Field would be something like a highly stretched tennis net made of the finest spiders web. And in this model “matter” would be a balled up piece of the web stuck to the net (everything is infinitesimally small). This field is not stationary in space with other things rushing through it like MM mistakenly assumed. It is everywhere and surrounds matter. (note: it might be stationary way out in deep space where there are no planetary, solar and galactic, etc. Movements)

    It works in the same type of manner as gravity (a group effort to push or pull in any particular direction) but opposite in force direction. Every particle attracts every other particle but that just creates the field. Nothing can actually happen until an irregularity is introduced into the system, for instance any particle becoming confined as proton mass. Then the field will curve around it and it will be drawn to and/or attract anything in its realm. Gravity and force five ratio varies at different places, for instance near a star there is gravity and a tremendous light energy or expansive force, but on Earth there is gravity and only residual sunlight (expansive force). Gravity ( the actual particle attractions) are the major factor in drawing in a mass and curving the field. The centripetal force along with expansion keep it at bay. Remember… no matter how strong an individual segment of lattice structure, the whole structure is easily curved or warped by any other force. (if something is packing itself around something curved, like the surface of any planet or star, it will… you guessed it, curve.)
    Yes, all these things…
    Cosmological Constant: Fifth Force : Dark Energy : Quintessence
    … are what others have been unknowingly calling the the stretching property of Flux Particle Field.
    The field itself (and any loose particles) which completely fill space is unwittingly called Dark Matter: Luminiferous Æther : The Aether etc.
    One indivdual particle has been inadvertently called The God particle. etc.

    Gravitational Warpage :
    The stretched rubber bed sheet and the bowling ball aren’t an accurate model of the gravitational warpage of space… that implies the area nearer the sunken ball is higher density and other masses are attracted to it.
    The reverse happens, particles seek a lower density, as in (something like) pressure. You can’t say the higher mass or density has a higher gravity because you are using gravity in the example (the explanation) and you can’t because in this case it’s the question. In this model “gravity” is causing the acceleration downward not the curve. If you stick this model in space and incline the plain there is no effect. Space (everything) must have a actual field like explained. (Note: my 2-d and 3-d are different from what we’re talking about here)
    Also, if gravity (the actual pulling effect) is caused by a warping of the supposed void of space, there would be a measurable difference in even a miniscule range, for instance the opposite sides of a piece of paper held horizontally. If we stick this whole scenario in a vacuum, the paper would drop like a lead weight, leading us to believe there is an impossible different warp or curve per micro-meter. The force of gravity at the surface of the earth (for instance) and lets say 300 yards up, are about the same, correct? But now if you think of the sheet of paper in a vacuum… there is enough difference even in the range of a micrometer to make it drop like a lead weight? …there is so much difference/change on the opposite sides of paper that it drops like lead? Does that seem right? Do you see my point?
    In a micrometer there is a dramatic difference but 300 yards is the same? No, somethings really wrong with that thinking, it’s backwards.
    Just about the same “supposed” curve at 300 yards would be negligible at the micrometer, what’s causing the pull?
    The picture itself bothers me also… it uses a 2-D model (the sheet) to represent something that can’t be represented without sticking a 3-D bowling ball in it and including “gravity” (rolling downhill) without an explanation. And space itself is supposed to be one dimension higher than mass, not less. If you wanted to bump everything down from what is perceived as actuality to those dimensions…
    you would have to take a…
    3-D earth and 4-D space and reduce them to a…
    2-D earth and 3-D space, not the 2-D space (sheet) like the diagram.
    Four dimensional space is curved? Where or what is the curve? Is it thicker closer to the source of gravity? Why would something be attracted to a thicker area/density?
    Gravity isn’t curving space. It’s (space is) curved because the Sun or a planet is spherical. If the Sun were an infinitely sized flat object there wouldn’t be a curved field but it’s safe to assume there would still be what we call Gravity.

    P.S. Space is not empty, neither is a vacuum :
    Think about it… If there were actually literally nothing in a vacuum… how could there be so much force stopping you from pulling (for instance) a piston out of a cylinder? Why won’t it just fly apart? If you create a vacuum in a lab, what you are actually doing is (almost) evacuating all known matter and you are left with the same highly stretched particle field responsible for gravity and electromagnetic transfer. It’s the same as space… actually not a vacuum in the normal sense.

    Update: Here is the answer for Tension of Space:
    Everything is made from strings. The basic particle is 10 strings joined at their centers (or 20 radii). When they are balled up they are a proton or neutron. The individual radii (1 of 20 strings) are the connectors used to connect neutron to protons (balled up) and proton to electrons (full length but twisted together).

    (N)-(P)————————————-E———————————

    This same basic particle (with nothing balled up or twisted) is also the strings used in free space for conveyance of light and gravity.
    The mass of a proton is 1 amu.
    The length of 2 radii (or the diameter of an atom) is one angstrom.
    That is the equivalent of one string connection in any given direction.
    The mass of the 2 radii is 2 / 20 amu (or 1/10 of the proton).
    The speed of light is well known.
    Formula for Tension = velocity squared * mass / length.
    The really cool thing is you can google this…

    (speed of light ^ 2 * .1 amu) / 1 angstrom

    and the google calculator pops up with the correct answer for the tension of space…
    ((the speed of light^2) * .1 amu) / (1 angstrom) = 0.14924179 newtons
    ———

    I thought about this tension of space some more…
    If you have 2 weights pulling tension on a string. There would be no way to know the density of the string between them (even if the weights are made of the same type string material). If the string was thick or thin the tension would remain the same. This is what troubled me about just dividing the proton into 20 pieces and using that number as the mass. Although the proton is made from the same string material… the string (mass) itself is not dependant on that. Whatever the string is made from can’t actually be equated directly with mass. It is the smallest scale universal substance.

    But then I thought of another possible solution… the difference in the neutron and proton mass. That might actually be the closest mass number available for a string. If the neutron – proton difference is one string radius then 2 of them will equal the atomic diameter.

    So I used that in the equation…
    c^2 * (2 (neutron mass – proton mass)) divided by angstrom length

    speed of light ^ 2 * (2(1.67490 * 10^-27 kg – 1.67260 * 10^-27 kg)) / 1 angstrom

    All of the neutron strings are balled up. The proton has one string attaching to the electron. That is why it is slightly less mass. It is not 1/ 20th because the individual string mass is the “universal substance” not the same as what is called proton mass.

    Here is the google result by the way… google ((the speed of light^2) * (2 * ((1.67490 * ((10^(-27)) kg)) – (1.67260 * ((10^(-27)) kg))))) / (1 angstrom) = 0.00413427382 newtons

    The only other alternative available at the moment is electron mass, But that has charge on it and it is also attached to the proton. I think the neutron minus proton is the one to go with.

     
  • xulfrepus 10:40 pm on November 23, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    Flux 

    It is well known that all matter in the Universe is composed of atoms and sub-atomic particles, held together by four and only four fundamental forces. These four forces are:

    The Strong force (short range) : 100 = 1 = Unit force
    This is the force which powers the Sun. It is the devastating force behind hydrogen bombs and the force that binds protons / neutrons into nuclei. This unit force is given the value of one, or ten to the power of zero (100), all other forces are measured as a relative strength of it.

    Electro-magnetic force (long range): 10-2
    This is the force that binds atoms and molecules together and is also the force of electricity. It is the source of power behind for instance a light bulb. It is one hundredth the strength of Unit force so, the value is 1/100 or one divided by ten to the power of two = 1/(102) = 10-2

    Weak force (short range): 10-9
    This is the force responsible for radioactive decay and instability in certain nuclei. It is one billionth strength of Unit force so, its value is 1/1,000,000,000 or one divided by ten to the power of nine = 1/(109) = 10-9

    Gravitational force (long range): 10-38
    This is the force that holds the Earth in orbit around the Sun, keeps our feet firmly anchored to the ground and makes apples fall from trees. It is 1/(1038) (one divided by one followed by 38 zeroes) 1/100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 strength of Unit force so, the value is one divided by ten to the power of 38 = 1/(1038) = 10-38

    The Gravitational force between any two objects for example the Earth and Moon can be measured using one of Newton’s equations F = Gm1m2/r 2 . The constant G in this instance is the Universal gravitational constant. Meaning the force of gravity equals the product of any two masses divided by their radius (separation) squared, quantity times G.
    The value of the Gravitational constant is 6.67259 E-11 …m3 kg-1 s-2
    The exact value for this is G = 1/(10 * √26 -1)c …m3 kg-1 s-2
    G = 1/(10 * √26 – 1)c = 6.6725903807971 E-11 m3 kg-1 s-2 Exactor
    In this instance the speed of light “c” is just an amount of meters or a specific number , not meters per second.
    Which gives us the very intriguing…perfectly repeating…continued fractional form …
    1/(10 * √26 – 1)c= 1 / (10 [5,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,…10 ]-1)c
    that fits in really nice in our ten dimensional Universe.
    Square root 26 = [5,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,10,…10 ]
    that’s 5 and 1/10 with another 1/10 tacked onto the ten in the denominators forever
    1
    5 + —————-
    1
    10 + ————–
    10 + 1/(10 + 1/(10 + 1/10… etc.))

    G = 1/((10 * (√26))-1)c

    Flunot…
    center of axis
    (cut away view)

    So, this is the exact value for the Universal Gravitational Constant. But more importantly this defines the exact shape of the Unit Flux. It’s a particle and by simply altering its shape it becomes anything and everything in this Universe. It has 10 hypotenuse or diagonals joined at their centers, terminating on the vertices of the dodecahedron.
    This is the same as twenty radii emanating from a common center called a Flunot…

    Arrangement of Axis Unit Flux 10-D
    It has ten diagonals, nine with the force of light, one minus the charge or plus gravity (the normal state). They are composed of one dimensional (1-D) infinitesimal width string like objects arranged in a ten dimensional Dodecahedron axes pattern terminating on vertices or the set of twenty points…
    (+-x/y, +-xy, 0) where y = (√5+1)/2
    ( +-xy, 0, +-x/y) x = G /(20 * √3)
    ( 0, +-x/y, +-xy) G = 1/(10 * √26 – 1)c
    ( +-x, +-x, +-x)

    y = (√5+1)/2 = 1.61803398875 = the golden ratio.
    but, since we are at the quantum level where dimension is viable direction only, that makes ten dimensions in the actual space time continuum. The strings are only one dimension but are arranged in ten dimension Space. So the 10 different axes (20 different directions from origin) occupy or commandeer space in 10 dimensions without actually filling its volumetric area. Thereby leaving it almost empty.
    The Flux particles set up their own field (face centred cubic spherical space type pack) relative to the object of largest mass in proximity. This corresponds to a lattice which the center of every sphere or particle is the set of all points (x,y,z) where x, y, and z are integers adding up to an even number (That’s arrangement, not size).

    Flux particle…Nine Dimensional dispersion or 10-9
    One axis is used to convey the force…either photonic or gravitational, the other Nine axes are one dimension each.
    This is a ten dimensional Universe so, every axis is a power of ten. When a force or vibration is being transmitted through one axis of any particle it causes the 18 remaining radii repel away from the charge. As the shape changes from nine Dimension (remaining axes of dodecahedron) weak down to two dimension (disc) electron it causes the particle to separate from the field connections lattice along the way.
    The number of field connections is the determinate factor of relative strength or dimension of any particle. Any amount of repel or dimension change is possible here allowing force values from 10-9 through 10-2 on any particle or field created.

    Electron…Can disperse energy in 2-dimensions or 10-2 strength
    When one axis of any particle meets up with a proton charge and is held in place or a large force is being transmitted through it, two of the twenty radii are used as the Unit Force spike. The 18 remaining radii repel away from the charge into a two dimensional disc thus becoming the Electron.
    This makes “18” the determinant number in Electron shell arrangements, check the larger noble gases: Argon, Krypton, Xenon, Radon, the amount of electrons in outermost shells will always sum to 18, the first three even have atomic numbers that are multiples of eighteen.
    Three groups of six radii from one electron can form (along with seven other electrons) the corners of a cube or the “Octet Rule” (do the math…it works).

    Proton…Zero Dimensions or Unit force strength…100
    With the positive or constricting force the 18 remaining radii curl into six types of Quarks in three flavors thus creating a proton with two string radii left. The flux strings always curl in groups of three (red, blue, green) with combinations of either charge (frequency) or rest (zero) giving the Quark a characteristic One third or Two thirds spin flavor. A group of two is the Proton – Neutron – Connector Meson.
    If the proton were the size of the dot above the letter “i” then the strings could be compared to something a lot finer than the web of a spider extending out a few hundred meters. Fine enough where eighteen strings can curl into a space the size of the proton and have a spaghetti ball type configuration with a very loose string (or filament) pack.
    It is the way to make the most universe with the least amount of material.
    Newton’s equation F = Gm1m2/r 2 breaks down and becomes ineffective at the proton – electron size or atomic realm, the particle shape has altered and the actual mechanism of attraction or attachment has changed.

    Neutron… Nineteen curled radii, one spike left
    (dying to curl up with a proton spike)
    The Neutron has one more string radius curl than the proton giving it slightly more mass. Protons can chain together as they curl, a Neutron is a nice way to dead-end the chain so the force of Gravity can ensue.
    The string radii or spikes are the mechanism any particle… electron, proton or neutron etc. uses to connect and relay charge or vibration. In the atomic nucleus the last spike (one radius) of a neutron and one of the two proton spikes curl into a meson, that leaves the whole proton-neutron package with only one spike emanating from the proton, thereby leaving the neutron without an outlet, giving it a neutral charge.
    This means an actual free neutron will have all twenty radii curled. If one curled neutron radius suddenly uncoils… it will convert into a proton with the ejecting charge or vibration creating an Electron in the process and is called Beta Radiation (one diameters worth of charge is an Electron or in this case one half… spin?). Note: if the curled radius in the proton / neutron connector opposite the proton spike actually breaks off from the proton, once again the neutron radius suddenly uncoils creating the electron and proton but this time there is a free radius or diameter also and is called a neutrino.

    Quantum Weirdness:
    Electrical energy is used to power mechanical devices but at the quantum level Electrical energy is just a frictionless mechanical vibration.

     
  • xulfrepus 10:39 pm on November 23, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    Dimensionality 

    Contrary to popular belief… nothing is even remotely solid. At the sub atomic level it is well known the nucleus radius to electron orbital ratio is one hundred thousandth.
    That makes the volumetric or spatial difference one quadrillionth = 10-15 = ( .000 000 000 000 001 ) . This ratio is approximately the same size as a spherical dot (tittle) above the letter ” i ” (the proton) on the fifty – yard line in a football stadium (the orbital) everything else is empty space. That’s 99.9999999999999 % empty space.
    So, if we think of or visualize a huge sphere the size of a stadium (a small moon for instance), in reality the amount (4/3)Pi 13
    —————-
    (4/3)Pi 100,0003 = 1
    ———————
    1,000,000,000,000,000 = one
    quadrillionth

    of actual continuous mass (just nuclei) (4/3)Pi 13
    —————-
    (4/3)Pi 100,0003 = 1
    ———————
    1,000,000,000,000,000 = one
    quadrillionth
    is equivalent to a solid dot above the ” i ” made of only protons cut up into
    one quadrillion times 1,000 billion billion pieces and evenly dispersed. That’s how many (one quadrillion) “i” dots would fill the moon sized sphere (ignoring sphere packing) times the number of atomic radii (1,000 billion billion) it would take to fill every “i” dot.
    That’s why neutrinos can zip right through anything completely unfettered and why the moon is only there when someone is looking at it… if we couldn’t see vibrations of electron energy, the moon would be completely unnoticed.
    It has the same amount of literally solid “stuff” as a spherical tittle.

    Quantum Math
    When we differentiate, we get the instantaneous change in whatever equation or shape we consider. It’s easy to visualize because the starting equation or figure, for instance a 3-dimensional cube ( y = x3 ), gets lowered down a degree in power or dimension. i.e. ( y’ = 3×2) this can be equated to three planar two dimensional sides of the cube or the instantaneous change needed to increase the length, width and height (volume) of the cube. So, this means to instantaneously increase volume, tack on area to half the outside surface. Taking this one step further we arrive at ( y” = 6x ). This is simply six one dimensional lines or the instantaneous change needed to increase the length and width (area) of the three planes. Every plane needs two lines (length and width) to increase its area. Three planes times two lines equals six lines total.
    Now it gets even easier… six points ( y”’ = 6 ) are the instantaneous change needed to increase six lines in length (notice the six points are zero-dimensional). Now we arrive at ( y (4 ) = 0 ) …this is the instantaneous change needed to take the six points out of existence.
    A big problem occurs when we try to integrate something cubic ( y = x3 ) into the fourth dimension, in this case ( integral y ). We have an exact mathematical representation of it ( x 4 /4 ) and if x = 1 we know this is equal to 1/4’s worth of fourth dimensional volume (tesserarea?). But, what shape is it? Is it a snapshot in time? Is it an hypercube? Is it a mysterious visitor from the fourth dimension?

    The Cube isn’t Solid. Nothing is Solid
    Remember, nothing is even remotely solid. So you will rack your brain trying to visualize the integration of a solid or in this case an actual misconception. The mysterious fourth dimensional shape is a tetrahedral axes shaped particle group of higher density.
    Any one dimensional object is a line. Any two dimensional object is a plane. But that’s a slice of a supposed cube, and can’t be thought of as for instance a sheet of paper. Because, if we integrate enough of them into a stack, we have a solid cube of paper and by now we know… Nothing is Solid.
    The cube can’t be solid. So that form of thinking is simply wrong (note: The one dimensional line would also have to be in segments, and although we can actually integrate lines into a plane … the lines in this case are never arranged parallel so they won’t form a continuous plane that could then be integrated into a stack)…

    The cube isn’t solid but since it is there, it must be made of something. If we call the basic unit of whatever the cube is comprised of a particle. The particle must be capable of conveying information, for instance electro – magnetic vibrations. And since there are different frequencies and / or strengths of vibrations with multiple simultaneous combinations, a zero-dimensional single point particle would be incapable of achieving this. It can spin or move or remain at rest but there is no chance of Simultaneity or vibrations. The next possible alternative is the one dimensional line or string (any intrinsic universal characteristic will always be the simplest and at the same time most efficient option).
    The string seems to be the shape of choice in this case. On a musical instrument, a violin for instance, the string can convey a multitude of vibrations, tones and harmonics. This means there can be a lot of simultaneous information transmitted along a one dimensional string. There is no need to attempt theoretical construction of a particle made of two dimensional planes because… you don’t keep looking for the answer after you have found it. And, if we integrate enough of the planes into a stack, we would have a solid. Nothing is Solid.

    Particle Integration: x4/4 = 1/4 tessarea = 4 axis (? time)
    x3 = 1 volume = 3 axis (1 time)
    3×2 = 3 area = 2 axis (3 times)
    6x = 6 lines = 1 line (6 times)

    x4/4 = 1/4 tessarea = 4 axis (? time)
    x3 = 1 volume = 3 axis (1 time)
    3×2 = 3 area = 2 axis (3 times)
    6x = 6 lines = 1 line (6 times)
    So, the basic building blocks of particle construction must be line segments or strings. It’s their arrangement that makes all the
    difference. The basic unit of the x 3 variety is the X-Y-Z axes shaped particle. This is three strings joined at their centers. If in this example x = 1, then the three axis will each be 1 in length (X, Y and Z are 1 long) with a total length of Three with a cubic volume of 1. All widths are infinitesimal. When we differentiate x3 we get 3×2 , this is 3 plus signs or XY axes shaped particles that each have 2 axis with a total length of 6 and an area of 3, that makes 6 axis with 1 length each. This is also the correct amount to add one quadratic particle XY to every axis of the original differentiated particle giving the XYZ an instantaneous change.
    So, working this in reverse we see that as we integrate into a higher power it changes the shape by adding an axis and it shrinks in size (area, volume) giving it a greater density. So the fourth dimensional object is composed of tetrahedral axes shapes. In this example 4 axis with total length 4 and a fourth dimensional volume (tesserarea?) of one-fourth (1/4)
    f (1) = x4 /4 = 1/4 … that’s 4 axis, each one 1 in length. More particles are needed to fill any volume because of the tighter pack, ergo higher density. Now it is easy to see… in a field of 2-D ( XY ) particles we can only traverse horizontally and vertically. When we bump this up one dimension into 3-D we also have the toward and away axis. Alas, we still can’t move on a diagonal, for that is reserved for the higher dimensions.
    Now it’s a piece of cake to see how any length, for instance 1/(10 * √26 – 1)c, divided up correctly can be a direct representation of a particle(s).

    Spatial dimension is directions.
    An Abbott Flatlander from Flatland living on a two dimensional plane would actually be living on an infinity of dimensions if he can turn or move through every angle or vector direction on the supposed plane. The way this actually works is by using axial directions as dimension.
    An actual working two dimensional model of space would be an infinite array of 2-D axis shaped particles arranged in a plane with the negative or expansive force vibrating through their continuum (matrix). In this 2-D model light is coerced into traveling in straight lines in only two directions (This model can also warp or flex, forcing the curvature of light). If you took enough 2-D particles and curved and connected them into a spherical surface shape, it would be misinterpreted as 3-D.
    The actual 2-D electron is pulling this same prank by orbiting spherically and mimicking a 3-D solid. Nothing is actually 3-D and / or solid. Now that we know the basic workings of particles at the quantum level and we know vibrations occur in every possible direction, a 3-dimensional particle will not sufficiently transmit vibrations along a diagonal.
    So, 3-D doesn’t work. The particle capable of angular conveyance must be of higher dimension and have the most efficient shape to pack space. It turns out to be a particle with 10-dimensions or ten axes. In the ten dimensional dodecahedral matrix light is actually forced into zigzags.
    This axial concept allows for an actual visual of higher dimensions. If we integrate a supposed three-dimensional cube into the fourth dimension the result isn’t a snapshot of the cube in the fourth dimension, it is a tetrahedron with an increased density field matrix (tetrahedral).
    You have to remember… nothing is 3-D and / or solid.
    A proton is 0-D (zero-D), the electrons orbiting it are 2-D, we’re seeing this whole configuration through a 10-D field.
    So if you want to bump up one dimension higher than the dimension you actually see things in, you’re going to have to contemplate a mysterious visitor from the eleventh dimension (not the fourth).
    If you want to bump up something in dimension until it is actually solid… you’re on your way to creating your very own neutron star with a contiguous proton/neutron pack, We’re all in trouble if we get a visit from one of them.

    Quantum Weirdness:
    Everything might be actually happening very, very slowly. Since everything involved in the continuum structure is completely controlled or regulated at the speed of light (including Stars, Planets, any type of measuring device, Plants, Animals, Humans and everything else, excluding for instance neutrinos), we have no way of knowing what speed things are really happening.
    It’s like being a character in a movie, you are just film and you are trying to find out what speed the projector is running.
    If you could take a step out and away, literally remove yourself from everything and look back at what’s happening, The movie might run fast, slow, even stop and start and no one would be the wiser. There would be no way for the people still in the movie to discern this. The movie would be their whole universe, their very existence. The speed the projector is running is the speed their lives are happening.
    The Speed of light and all particle interactions might be traveling or happening at the pace of an Escargot (snail) but our brains are using the same speed vibration set by this cosmic speedometer so we’ll never know.

     
  • xulfrepus 5:15 pm on November 23, 2010 Permalink | Reply  

    Flux Particle Theory a Complete Theory of Everything 

    Flux Particle Theory a Complete Theory of Everything

    Properties of Energy & Matter…

    Common knowledge in the 21st century

    By James Clifford Cranwell 2/17/98

    Dimensionality|
    Flux|
    Gravity|
    Atomic Structure|
    Relativity|
    Big Bang|
    Misc.|

    Elliptical Orbit Gravitational Engine

     


    Everything in the Universe is made from one type of particle.

    All workings of the Universe are result from said particle.

     

     

    dodecahedron

     

    Abstract:

     

    “Flux Particle Theory… How to make the most universe with the least amount of material”

    Every first year Chemistry student learns of the proton to electron orbital ratio (how an atom is mostly empty space). But if you asked the same student what a three dimensional object is they would undoubtedly say a solid.
    To me this is just flat out wrong (nothing is solid). 

    If we look back in history, there was a point in time when everyone thought the Earth was the center of the universe and the Sun revolved around it. Even the educated people of the day wouldn’t have had any doubt to the validity of this concept, based on the fact that you can actually see the Sun rise and set (supposedly orbit) around the Earth on any given day.

    Extremely accurate measurements of the Suns orbit could have also been taken. Leading the whole scientific community to believe they have proved something to ten or twelve decimal places. Not only falsely confirming the theory, but also inadvertently giving a fundamentally incorrect foundation for others to build upon. That’s an extremely important point. Even though all the egg-heads concur on something… they can see it, measure it, derive a math formula about it, they are all backwards and thereby wrong.

    Therefore, even though everyone thinks something works in a certain way and can actually see it with their own two eyes, there is still an allowance for something happening in a completely different manner. And there is always an easier explanation or a different way to explain something. There can even be a completely new math based on particle lengths. It doesn’t mean everything else is incorrect, it means this can also be correct.

    Flux theory is a complete theory of everything… including Gravity, The four forces and a completely new way to understand the way dimensionality actually works. It is based solely on irrefutable logic. And although it is easily understandable by anyone, it requires an open mind and a completely new way of thinking.

    Flux Theory explains (or you will automatically understand) Gravity, Mass, Particle shapes, The Double Slit Experiment, The Four Forces, The Fifth Force, Fringe Patterns, Dark Matter, Missing Matter in the Universe, Binding energy, Alpha Beta Gamma Radiation, Atomic Structures, Induced Fields, Interference, Photo Electric Effect, Polarization of Light, Wave / Particle Duality, Zeeman Effect, Zero-point Energy, Why Superstring theories work mathematically in ten dimensions, Previously unknown effects, Constants and Theories of others (if they were on the right track). It makes everything fall into place.

    A great scientist once said the Grand Unified Field might be a geometric problem, that’s exactly what this solution is. A single consistent theory that explains all observations. And this theory is a description what is really going on, “underneath it all.”

     
     

    Properties of Energy & Matter | Part 1 Dimensionality
    |

     

     

     


    How and why did I discover gravity?


    Flux
    | Bookmark
    | astrocalc
    | Vanessa Mae

    | Lazyboy
    | © Goddess 401
    | admin@gootar.com
    | http://www.gravityboy.com

    | Eagle Nebula | Ultra deep field viewer
    | Hubble
    | India Colors
    | Random Colors
    | Random Banner Colors
    | rubik
    | VanCube

    Your name in base 36
    | TI-85/86
    | guitar
    | tech
    | find names
    | Font-o-matic
    | piano
    | Origami Ganesh
    | 4 strings
    | Gootar

     

    It’s easy to see from this picture the sun is only about

    10 or 20 miles away and right behind the trees

     

     

     

    Ti-85,86 programs, Guitar chords, Origami Ganesh, Vanessa Mae
    TI-85/86

    guitar
    | tech

    find names

    rubik

    piano
    piano
    Origami Ganesh
    Origami
    Ganesh

    4 strings

     

     
    c
    Compose new post
    j
    Next post/Next comment
    k
    Previous post/Previous comment
    r
    Reply
    e
    Edit
    o
    Show/Hide comments
    t
    Go to top
    l
    Go to login
    h
    Show/Hide help
    shift + esc
    Cancel